Template talk:Magikoopas: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


I thought I would just seperate characters from the actual species instead of having them together. -- [[User:Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]]
I thought I would just seperate characters from the actual species instead of having them together. -- [[User:Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]]
Well... if there were atleast four Magikoopa characters, then I can create a separate section, but for now, no{{User:Knife/sig}}
:I disagree, the way it is now is confusing. We should divide it into sub-sections like all the other Koopa species' templates. - [[User:Walkazo|Walkazo]]
::All done! - [[User:Walkazo|Walkazo]]
== [[Tutankoopa]] ==
I added him because it's been canocally stated that he's a wizard, and if you look closely his nose is structured like a [[Magikoopa]]'s, not a [[Koopa Troopa]]'s (which he would be listed as if not a Magikoopa). Any second opinions? - [[User:Walkazo|Walkazo]]
:Er... Wouldn't he be a "Magikoopa Character" and not a species? {{User:InfectedShroom/sig}}

Latest revision as of 11:54, May 10, 2008

Why is this template not aligned right?Knife (talk)

I thought I would just seperate characters from the actual species instead of having them together. -- Sir Grodus

Well... if there were atleast four Magikoopa characters, then I can create a separate section, but for now, noKnife (talk)

I disagree, the way it is now is confusing. We should divide it into sub-sections like all the other Koopa species' templates. - Walkazo
All done! - Walkazo

Tutankoopa[edit]

I added him because it's been canocally stated that he's a wizard, and if you look closely his nose is structured like a Magikoopa's, not a Koopa Troopa's (which he would be listed as if not a Magikoopa). Any second opinions? - Walkazo

Er... Wouldn't he be a "Magikoopa Character" and not a species? BLOC PARTIER.