Category talk:Human-like characters: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (PorpleBot moved page Category talk:Human-Like Characters to Category talk:Human-Like characters: Text replacement - " Characters$" to " characters") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this category really necessary? It seems like all it will have is some Xenoblade and Kid Icarus characters, and I don't think we need an entire category just to group a handful of crossover characters from different franchises that happen to look like humans but aren't humans. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 15:10, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | Is this category really necessary? It seems like all it will have is some Xenoblade and Kid Icarus characters, and I don't think we need an entire category just to group a handful of crossover characters from different franchises that happen to look like humans but aren't humans. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 15:10, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:As of now, nothing here originates from the Mario franchise, even stating so in the category page itself that the majority aren't ''Mario'' characters. So no, if it's just crossover characters I don't think we need this. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 15:14, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | :As of now, nothing here originates from the Mario franchise, even stating so in the category page itself that the majority aren't ''Mario'' characters. So no, if it's just crossover characters I don't think we need this. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} 15:14, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | ||
::Yeah, it's mostly there because people were automatically classifying anything that looks like a human as "human" when they're not (goddesses, angels, Blades), but I figured it could be expanded eventually, for example if [[New Donker]]s are eventually confirmed to not be human. Maybe the definition of the category can be expanded to include ''Mario'' species/characters that resemble humans but aren't, such as the [[Beanbean Kingdom]] citizens? And is [[Rosalina]] even still human?--[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 21:23, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | ::Yeah, it's mostly there because people were automatically classifying anything that looks like a human as "human" when they're not (goddesses, angels, Blades), but I figured it could be expanded eventually, for example if [[New Donker]]s are eventually confirmed to not be human. Maybe the definition of the category can be expanded to include ''Mario'' species/characters that resemble humans but aren't, such as the [[Beanbean Kingdom]] citizens? And is [[Rosalina]] even still human?--[[User:Megatron|Megatron]] ([[User talk:Megatron|talk]]) 21:23, July 18, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:57, September 4, 2021
Is this category really necessary? It seems like all it will have is some Xenoblade and Kid Icarus characters, and I don't think we need an entire category just to group a handful of crossover characters from different franchises that happen to look like humans but aren't humans. --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 15:10, July 18, 2021 (EDT)
- As of now, nothing here originates from the Mario franchise, even stating so in the category page itself that the majority aren't Mario characters. So no, if it's just crossover characters I don't think we need this.
Nightwicked Bowser 
15:14, July 18, 2021 (EDT)
- Yeah, it's mostly there because people were automatically classifying anything that looks like a human as "human" when they're not (goddesses, angels, Blades), but I figured it could be expanded eventually, for example if New Donkers are eventually confirmed to not be human. Maybe the definition of the category can be expanded to include Mario species/characters that resemble humans but aren't, such as the Beanbean Kingdom citizens? And is Rosalina even still human?--Megatron (talk) 21:23, July 18, 2021 (EDT)
