User:Time Q/Unfeature: Difference between revisions
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) m (testing) |
m (Text replacement - "" to "") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
width=80 | width=80 | ||
buttonlabel=Propose | buttonlabel=Propose | ||
preload=Template:Preload/ | preload=Template:Preload/Unfa | ||
editintro=Template: | editintro=Template:UnFAintro | ||
break=no | break=no | ||
</inputbox> | </inputbox> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing== | ==FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing== | ||
<DPL> | <DPL> | ||
category= | category=Unfeature | ||
namespace=MarioWiki | namespace=MarioWiki | ||
ordermethod=lastedit | ordermethod=lastedit | ||
order=descending | order=descending | ||
addeditdate=true | addeditdate=true | ||
include={ | include={UNFANOMSTAT}:nominated, {UNFANOMSTAT}:passed | ||
format={| style="border-collapse:collapse" cellpadding=5 width=100% \n! Proposed to be Unfeatured !! Last Edited... !! First Proposed... !! Met Requirements for Unfeaturing On..., \n|- \n| [[%PAGE%|%TITLE%]] \n| %DATE%,\n,|} | format={| style="border-collapse:collapse" cellpadding=5 width=100% \n! Proposed to be Unfeatured !! Last Edited... !! First Proposed... !! Met Requirements for Unfeaturing On..., \n|- \n| [[%PAGE%|%TITLE%]] \n| %DATE%,\n,|} | ||
secseparators=\n|,,\n| ''<u>,</u>'' | secseparators=\n|,,\n| ''<u>,</u>'' | ||
Latest revision as of 12:58, September 4, 2021
Normally, once an article becomes a Featured Article, it keeps its featured status, no matter how long it is since it was featured. However, it might come to a situation where a FA cannot maintain its high quality (for example, when a new game is released and the article does not cover it). For this reason, there is the possibility to propose the Unfeaturing of a FA.
The process of unfeaturing bears great resemblence to the process of featuring an article. Indeed, the only differences are the following:
- Obviously, only FAs can be proposed to lose their FA status. Supporters vote for the loss of FA status, and opposers vote for keeping it.
- Not only opposers, but also supporters need to give reasons for their vote. This is due to the fact that what they are doing basically is opposing the FA status of an article, and this needs to be justified.
- Similarly, not only oppose votes, but also support votes can be removed if they are not well-reasoned enough. The agreement of five users, including a sysop, is needed to remove a vote.
- In order to avoid keeping nomination pages alive even if the (featured) article is fine, those pages can be deleted if the proposer agrees. Otherwise, the 'delete-after-one-month-of-inactiveness' rule applies.
All the other rules (as long as there is at least one oppose vote, the proposal will not pass; after a week without opposers and with at least five supporters, the proposal passes; etc.) apply just as with the FA nomination process. Particularly, oppose votes should be regarded as a way to improve a FA further and thus to avoid the loss of FA status. Only in case there is nobody willing to realize the opposers' requests, a FA loses its status.
How to Unfeature a FA
In order to propose a FA for unfeaturing, please use the following edit field. Type in the exact title of the FA after the last slash, and hit the "Propose" button. You will be taken to a preset page which you should edit according to the comments on the page.
FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing
<DPL> category=Unfeature namespace=MarioWiki ordermethod=lastedit order=descending addeditdate=true include={UNFANOMSTAT}:nominated, {UNFANOMSTAT}:passed format={| style="border-collapse:collapse" cellpadding=5 width=100% \n! Proposed to be Unfeatured !! Last Edited... !! First Proposed... !! Met Requirements for Unfeaturing On..., \n|- \n| %TITLE% \n| %DATE%,\n,|} secseparators=\n|,,\n| , </DPL>
