User talk:Pholvandir: Difference between revisions
Pholvandir (talk | contribs) Tag: Mobile edit |
Pholvandir (talk | contribs) Tag: Mobile edit |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Incorrect Usage== | ==Incorrect Usage== | ||
This is a subversion of the word’s meaning; “they” is plural, and any use of the word outside a plural sense is strictly improper. English does not behold to political agendas; the opposite must be true for us to communicate properly. | This is a subversion of the word’s meaning; “they” is plural, and any use of the word outside a plural sense is strictly improper. The reason “they” is improperly defined by Webster’s is to accommodate dangerous hyper-political correctness. English does not behold to political agendas; the opposite must be true for us to communicate properly. If we redefine our language to mold to whatever is currently considered “correct,” then we will reach a point where we cannot communicate ideas that contradict the current prevailing narrative, which will annihilate freedom of thought. |
Revision as of 00:03, April 30, 2021
Singular "they"
Actually, according to Webster's Dictionary, "they" is indeed an acceptable singular pronoun for gender-ambiguous or -neutral situations. Just letting you know. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:49, April 29, 2021 (EDT)
Incorrect Usage
This is a subversion of the word’s meaning; “they” is plural, and any use of the word outside a plural sense is strictly improper. The reason “they” is improperly defined by Webster’s is to accommodate dangerous hyper-political correctness. English does not behold to political agendas; the opposite must be true for us to communicate properly. If we redefine our language to mold to whatever is currently considered “correct,” then we will reach a point where we cannot communicate ideas that contradict the current prevailing narrative, which will annihilate freedom of thought.