User talk:Ninelevendo: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) |
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px" | {| class="infobox" style="float:right;border:black double 1px;background-color:#fdfdff;padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 1em;width:270px" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align="center" | ''' | ! align="center" | '''Archives''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
*'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive1 | *'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive1]]''' | ||
*'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive2 | *'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive2]]''' | ||
*'''[[User talk:Ninelevendo/Archive3]]''' | |||
|} | |} | ||
== | == Low quality?! (''Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour'' article) == | ||
I just noticed earlier today that said edits that I made in terms of respectful "image reversion attempts" on the ''Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour'' article was undone by you as well, but saying that that the "images were low quality". Care to explain this to me, just to be sure? My intention when checking that section was for most of the "positive animation" stuff that the Mario female characters (Peach/Daisy) would be the best to "demonstrate" this. --M. C. - [[User:MeritC|Profile]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 19:16, November 9, 2020 (EST) | |||
*The images were low resolution so I replaced them with higher res screenshots. I personally don't see how the characters being female makes them better at expressing a positive reaction at a score result, if anything I would probably say that most of Peach's animations aren't expressive enough. Her Birdie animation for example has her waving nonchalantly, which doesn't do a great job at showing that she's happy with the result, especially when compared to another character, like Mario, who has his thumbs up with a smiling expression. I didn't replace that image however as its quality seems fine and there aren't any higher res screenshots from what I could see. - {{subst:nosubst|User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 14:40, November 10, 2020 (EST) | |||
I | |||
Latest revision as of 14:40, November 10, 2020
| Archives
|
|---|
Low quality?! (Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour article)[edit]
I just noticed earlier today that said edits that I made in terms of respectful "image reversion attempts" on the Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour article was undone by you as well, but saying that that the "images were low quality". Care to explain this to me, just to be sure? My intention when checking that section was for most of the "positive animation" stuff that the Mario female characters (Peach/Daisy) would be the best to "demonstrate" this. --M. C. - Profile | Talk Page 19:16, November 9, 2020 (EST)
- The images were low resolution so I replaced them with higher res screenshots. I personally don't see how the characters being female makes them better at expressing a positive reaction at a score result, if anything I would probably say that most of Peach's animations aren't expressive enough. Her Birdie animation for example has her waving nonchalantly, which doesn't do a great job at showing that she's happy with the result, especially when compared to another character, like Mario, who has his thumbs up with a smiling expression. I didn't replace that image however as its quality seems fine and there aren't any higher res screenshots from what I could see. - {{subst:nosubst|User:Ninelevendo/sig}} 14:40, November 10, 2020 (EST)
