Template talk:Rewrite-expand: Difference between revisions
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) m (→Why) |
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) (→Why) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Why== | ==Why== | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
This template is very confusing to work with. The reason needs a "reason=" in the summary, with the ''date it was added'' (which is also redundant to the page history) being prioritized over it. This template needs a rewrite, desperately. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 23:28, September 25, 2019 (EDT) | This template is very confusing to work with. The reason needs a "reason=" in the summary, with the ''date it was added'' (which is also redundant to the page history) being prioritized over it. Worse yet, the reason isn't in a parenthesis like literally ''every other notice template here'', potentially confusing editors. This template needs a rewrite, desperately. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 23:28, September 25, 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:38, September 25, 2019
These templates are a bit big, aren't they? I'd say we remove the line which says:
Please remove this template once or when the article has been expanded.
It seems pretty useless to me. I'd rather have a more clear article layout, with less space taken up by the notifier templates. They could all be smoothed a bit and have less bright colors. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 15:41, 27 November 2007 (EST)
- Go ahead. I used that Please... line on one template and it was copied over to all of them. Wa
TC@Y 15:53, 27 November 2007 (EST)
image
could we put an image here? it looks boring without one.
Loves
- I'll point out that there are currently only two notice templates with images on them. Besides, adding an image just looks weird. GreenDisaster 18:47, 18 May 2012 (EDT)
New Template Design!
See here for voting on a new template: New Template Design!
Why
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
This template is very confusing to work with. The reason needs a "reason=" in the summary, with the date it was added (which is also redundant to the page history) being prioritized over it. Worse yet, the reason isn't in a parenthesis like literally every other notice template here, potentially confusing editors. This template needs a rewrite, desperately. TheDarkStar 
23:28, September 25, 2019 (EDT)
