MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Party (series): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) (doing the vote) |
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) (going by simple logic, special:diff works on edt) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{FANOMSTAT | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=22:41, August 4, 2019 (EDT) | |nominated=22:41, August 4, 2019 (EDT) | ||
|passed= | |passed=11:11, August 6, 2019 (EDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
Revision as of 10:13, August 6, 2019
Mario Party (series)
Support
- Baby Luigi (talk) Giving this article a shot, which is written in a similar style to Mario Kart (series) and Mario (franchise), much credit to our friend SethAllen623 (talk), whom I cannot thank enough for the help overhauling the article. The article does an excellent job summarizing the Mario Party series, detailing the objective of most entries, and even acknowledging the weird Japan-only arcade Mario Party games. And it has a neat general reception section for its games in the series as well as its legacy (I should add that it spawned copycats such as Sonic Shuffle, Pac-Man Party, Animal Crossing: amiibo Festival, etc. too come to think of it). If Mario Kart (series) can be featured, then I don't see why this article can't.
- Owencrazyboy9 (talk) After a quick skimthrough, yeah, basically everything is in-depth and easy to look to for quick summaries, with the individual game links covering information specific to them. Like with Mario Party: Star Rush before it, it definitely deserves to be a featured article. Per Baby Luigi.
- FanOfYoshi (talk) Agreed.
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Sure, sounds good to me.
- TheDarkStar (talk) This is a very well-written page, going into immense detail on everything. Per all.
