Talk:Beanie: Difference between revisions
Mikan-chan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:They seem somewhat along the lines of Lakipea, Sharpea, Troopea, and other bean versions of normal enemies. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 21:43, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | :They seem somewhat along the lines of Lakipea, Sharpea, Troopea, and other bean versions of normal enemies. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 21:43, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::The way the species relations parameters work on here is sort of vague. They seem to at least be ''conceptually'' derived from them, but they aren't a ''variant'' of them. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:12, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | ::The way the species relations parameters work on here is sort of vague. They seem to at least be ''conceptually'' derived from them, but they aren't a ''variant'' of them. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:12, May 30, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::I see. [[User:Mikan-chan|Kan Kan Mikan~]] ([[User talk:Mikan-chan|talk]]) 05:42, June 2, 2019 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:42, June 2, 2019
Category?
Would it be overkill to make Category:Beanies? Niiue (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
- Given that there's only like three, then yes, yes it would. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 02:48, 13 August 2017 (CT)
- Five actually. Niiue (talk) 03:52, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
- Per this: not really necessary if they're all already listed on the Beanie page.
Mario JC 03:58, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
- They could probably fit in Category:Beanish maybe? Or is that mainly for the more humanoid characters?
12:48, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
- The Beanish category is vaguely defined, considering it also includes Beanlets, which are explicitly shown to be pets of the Beanish, and at one point included every enemy that was equivalent to another enemy from the main series (Lakipea, for example, was including since it was the "Beanish" equivalent of a Lakitu). It could do with a good once-over. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 13:00, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
- They could probably fit in Category:Beanish maybe? Or is that mainly for the more humanoid characters?
- Per this: not really necessary if they're all already listed on the Beanie page.
- Five actually. Niiue (talk) 03:52, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
Identifier
This didn't have an identifier before. This is an enemy that has appeared in three fairly-popular games. The other Beanie is a projectile that one boss rarely shoots (seemingly preferring to use vines, iirc) from a largely-unpopular game. Logic dictates that this could easily take priority....but either way, the identifier's bad, it should be "Mario & Luigi series" since they appeared in Dream Team during one of Gold Beanie's attacks. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:42, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- I've actually played Yoshi's New Island and I completely forgot about the Beanies from that game. I'm for killing the identifier altogether.
02:30, 30 August 2018 (EDT)
- As told here, those from Yoshi's New Island don't have a source of the Beanie name (hence Snifberg isn't called after the enemy either). --
FanOfYoshi at 10:59, 30 September 2018 (EDT)
- I would support removing the identifier from this page, as these Beanies are recurring enemies, rather than projectiles. The current identifier is definitely incorrect due to their appearance in Dream Team. --
TheFlameChomp (talk) 11:03, 30 September 2018 (EDT)
- I would support removing the identifier from this page, as these Beanies are recurring enemies, rather than projectiles. The current identifier is definitely incorrect due to their appearance in Dream Team. --
- As told here, those from Yoshi's New Island don't have a source of the Beanie name (hence Snifberg isn't called after the enemy either). --
Derived from Goombas?
On the page, it says Beanies are a derived species of Goomba. I thought they were just the BeanBean Kingdom's equivalent of Goombas. Should I change Goombas to a related species? Kan Kan Mikan~ (talk) 19:16, May 29, 2019 (EDT)
- They seem somewhat along the lines of Lakipea, Sharpea, Troopea, and other bean versions of normal enemies. LinkTheLefty (talk) 21:43, May 30, 2019 (EDT)
- The way the species relations parameters work on here is sort of vague. They seem to at least be conceptually derived from them, but they aren't a variant of them. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 22:12, May 30, 2019 (EDT)
- I see. Kan Kan Mikan~ (talk) 05:42, June 2, 2019 (EDT)
- The way the species relations parameters work on here is sort of vague. They seem to at least be conceptually derived from them, but they aren't a variant of them. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 22:12, May 30, 2019 (EDT)