Talk:Fire Nipper Plant: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) m (→Name: For clarification, since I did agree with renaming the article in the end.) |
(→Name) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::::I don't think this is citogenesis. I doubt Piranha Plant, much less the accompanying Palutena's Guidance, was planned in 2016. So yes, agreed. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 10:53, April 21, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::I don't think this is citogenesis. I doubt Piranha Plant, much less the accompanying Palutena's Guidance, was planned in 2016. So yes, agreed. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 10:53, April 21, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Although not fully on board with the usage of Nipper Dandelion, I completely agree with renaming the article to Fire Nipper Plant. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:00, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::Although not fully on board with the usage of Nipper Dandelion, I completely agree with renaming the article to Fire Nipper Plant. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:00, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Fiery Walking Piranha was a name that pretty much needed to be renamed anyways, as its name is overly descriptive and does not say if it is a Nipper Plant. Als,o Fire Nipper Plant is an extremely logical name, and we should not prohibit Nintendo from using obvious names just because it was once a conjectural name here. It would be like if when ''[[Super Mario Maker 2]]'' releases [[Bell Tree]]s are called well, Bell Trees. We would still use the Bell Tree name as it would then be official, and a name that '''''anyone''''' could of made up on their own. Regardless, fan-made names can become official too. I support the move. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 11:08, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:08, April 22, 2019
Name
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
So, considering the precedent set by the Nipper Dandelion situation, should this be moved to Fire Nipper Plant? Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 01:13, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- I'm not too sure... Pretty sure that's citogenesis, but i'm not sure wether to move it or not, even when we moved Watage Pakkun back to Nipper Dandelion. --
YoshiHater at 02:22, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- Did the name appear in the relevant Palutena's Guidance? That, of course, would be the ticket to renaming.
(T|C) 03:14, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- That it did. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 03:22, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- Is it me, or it doesn't figure out in the english version? -- YoshiHater at 03:24, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- It appeared in translation subtitles when set to other languages. Which is still in-game. Anyways, calling a perfectly logical and rational name "citogenesis" (which is a word you should expunge from your vocabulary according to Glowsquid) is just ridiculous. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:39, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- I don't think this is citogenesis. I doubt Piranha Plant, much less the accompanying Palutena's Guidance, was planned in 2016. So yes, agreed.
10:53, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- Although not fully on board with the usage of Nipper Dandelion, I completely agree with renaming the article to Fire Nipper Plant. LinkTheLefty (talk) 11:00, April 22, 2019 (EDT)
- Fiery Walking Piranha was a name that pretty much needed to be renamed anyways, as its name is overly descriptive and does not say if it is a Nipper Plant. Als,o Fire Nipper Plant is an extremely logical name, and we should not prohibit Nintendo from using obvious names just because it was once a conjectural name here. It would be like if when Super Mario Maker 2 releases Bell Trees are called well, Bell Trees. We would still use the Bell Tree name as it would then be official, and a name that anyone could of made up on their own. Regardless, fan-made names can become official too. I support the move. Doomhiker (talk)
11:08, April 22, 2019 (EDT)
- Fiery Walking Piranha was a name that pretty much needed to be renamed anyways, as its name is overly descriptive and does not say if it is a Nipper Plant. Als,o Fire Nipper Plant is an extremely logical name, and we should not prohibit Nintendo from using obvious names just because it was once a conjectural name here. It would be like if when Super Mario Maker 2 releases Bell Trees are called well, Bell Trees. We would still use the Bell Tree name as it would then be official, and a name that anyone could of made up on their own. Regardless, fan-made names can become official too. I support the move. Doomhiker (talk)
- Although not fully on board with the usage of Nipper Dandelion, I completely agree with renaming the article to Fire Nipper Plant. LinkTheLefty (talk) 11:00, April 22, 2019 (EDT)
- I don't think this is citogenesis. I doubt Piranha Plant, much less the accompanying Palutena's Guidance, was planned in 2016. So yes, agreed.
- It appeared in translation subtitles when set to other languages. Which is still in-game. Anyways, calling a perfectly logical and rational name "citogenesis" (which is a word you should expunge from your vocabulary according to Glowsquid) is just ridiculous. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 03:39, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- Is it me, or it doesn't figure out in the english version? --
- That it did. Niiue - Who has lost his tail? 03:22, April 21, 2019 (EDT)
- Did the name appear in the relevant Palutena's Guidance? That, of course, would be the ticket to renaming.
