User talk:Benjaminkirsc: Difference between revisions
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:How unfourtne and sorry. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 18:32, 12 December 2018 (EST) | :How unfourtne and sorry. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 18:32, 12 December 2018 (EST) | ||
::It's fine, everyone makes mistakes. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:51, 12 December 2018 (EST) | ::It's fine, everyone makes mistakes. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:51, 12 December 2018 (EST) | ||
:::Now I believe you. | :::Now I believe you. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 18:52, 12 December 2018 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:52, December 12, 2018
Transparent images
Please stop reverting images to older transparency ones. The ones you're reverting to are either smaller or have poorly done/unofficial transparency. A white background is fine. 13:39, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
Hi. It's Ben. @Alex95. Some of the images are large enogh but need transparency.
- They don't exactly need transparency. If the official image has transparency, then great. But if not, there's no need to add it. The transparency for artwork should be official and not manually done. 13:47, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
@Alex95 thanks but the imgaes may need better transparency. If the transparency gets the image smaller, then I won't edit it.
- That's not what I meant. If the transparency isn't official, the artwork image shouldn't have it. 13:51, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
Thanks guys for the comments. @ Thanks for the point. @(T|C) Your welcome!
This is a warning to stop your inappropriate behavior (reverting to lower-quality images) on the Super Mario Wiki. Please adhere to the rules or you will be blocked from editing this site. If you feel this warning was undeserved, you may appeal it. |
You're continuing to ignore our advice and still are reverting to lower-quality images. There was no point to this revision, all you did was make the image smaller. Enough. Keep it up and you'll receive a last warning, followed by a ban. 14:10, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- Yeah, you should. And no need to pull up our signatures, just type out our names. Much easier that way. 14:21, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
Well. Can you make the image larger for this picture this revision?
@ okay. Crop it. Why not? Edit: Can you help me edit images! @
Okay! @ Should I use PNG Monstrous?
FYI
Hi there. Just a quick tip, no user but the admins can possibly edit your userpage at all. I know from experience that admins like Alex95 can, but they'll only do that if your page interferes with the rest of the wiki. For example, mine was edited because I accidentally added it to a mainspace category. Anyway, no need to worry about your userpage being vandalized. Welcome, by the way.
(--) 15:50, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
- There also actually are a few spelling mistakes, "us" should be "is" and "plumber" has a b in it. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:33, 20 June 2018 (EDT)
Oh Ok, Benjamin Kirsch!
RE:Kinda curious
You're confusing me... Did you find officially transparent artwork that you would like to upload as a PNG? (T|C) 09:24, 19 August 2018 (EDT)
Nah. But I need help here. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 11:00, 19 August 2018 (EDT)
You can change some pictures when it's non transpacey, make a PNG, to make policy, as you can do on some WarioWare Gold picture? Like the 9-Volt.
Page galleries
Images should not be on a page's gallery section if they're already on the page elsewhere. That is just how it works here, we don't want redundant images. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2018 (EST)
- How unfourtne and sorry. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2018 (EST)
- It's fine, everyone makes mistakes. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2018 (EST)
- Now I believe you. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 18:52, 12 December 2018 (EST)
- It's fine, everyone makes mistakes. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2018 (EST)