Talk:Snailicorn: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Bully relation == | == Bully relation == | ||
{{talk}} | |||
Should these really be listed as a related species to Bullies just because of the internal filename? Neither of its actual names suggest a relation, nor does its appearance. Seems to me like they were simply planning to have a Bully appear before replacing it with an original creature instead, kind of like how Yoshi was originally a type of Koopa - it doesn't mean the actual species are related. [[User:SuperDragonRosalina|SuperDragonRosalina]] ([[User talk:SuperDragonRosalina|talk]]) 07:58, 11 November 2018 (EST) | Should these really be listed as a related species to Bullies just because of the internal filename? Neither of its actual names suggest a relation, nor does its appearance. Seems to me like they were simply planning to have a Bully appear before replacing it with an original creature instead, kind of like how Yoshi was originally a type of Koopa - it doesn't mean the actual species are related. [[User:SuperDragonRosalina|SuperDragonRosalina]] ([[User talk:SuperDragonRosalina|talk]]) 07:58, 11 November 2018 (EST) | ||
:I think how it is, just a fun trivia point that it shares its name with Bully suggesting some pre-development ideas that were altered before release, is fine. What's released is released, and I see no reason to rope comparisons based on scrapped ideas. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 17:07, 11 November 2018 (EST) | :I think how it is, just a fun trivia point that it shares its name with Bully suggesting some pre-development ideas that were altered before release, is fine. What's released is released, and I see no reason to rope comparisons based on scrapped ideas. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 17:07, 11 November 2018 (EST) | ||
::By the same token though, several other enemies are listed as being derived or related due to the same situation. Admittedly, with most of these, the physical resemblance is greater; however, our definition of "derived" includes "based upon conceptually," which these doubtlessly are. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:31, 12 November 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:31, November 12, 2018
Hmmm weird, I am at World 8 in New Super Mario Bros. and I don't remember facing these guys. Koopa K (talk)
Please leave this kind of talk to the forums. --Super Yoshi Bros Your life is written in pen, not pencil. You can't erase your mistakes, but you can put a line through them and move on. 15:12, 25 August 2012 (EDT)
Bully relation
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Should these really be listed as a related species to Bullies just because of the internal filename? Neither of its actual names suggest a relation, nor does its appearance. Seems to me like they were simply planning to have a Bully appear before replacing it with an original creature instead, kind of like how Yoshi was originally a type of Koopa - it doesn't mean the actual species are related. SuperDragonRosalina (talk) 07:58, 11 November 2018 (EST)
- I think how it is, just a fun trivia point that it shares its name with Bully suggesting some pre-development ideas that were altered before release, is fine. What's released is released, and I see no reason to rope comparisons based on scrapped ideas.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 17:07, 11 November 2018 (EST)
- By the same token though, several other enemies are listed as being derived or related due to the same situation. Admittedly, with most of these, the physical resemblance is greater; however, our definition of "derived" includes "based upon conceptually," which these doubtlessly are. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2018 (EST)
