Talk:Flaptor: Difference between revisions
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Should I put this under the more-specific [[:Category:Owls]]? It looks like a stylized owl, what with the flat circular face and all. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:02, 10 March 2018 (EST) | Should I put this under the more-specific [[:Category:Owls]]? It looks like a stylized owl, what with the flat circular face and all. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:02, 10 March 2018 (EST) | ||
:I agree that they look very owl-like. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:23, 10 March 2018 (EST) | :I agree that they look very owl-like. {{User:Mario jc/sig}} 22:23, 10 March 2018 (EST) | ||
::The only thing that is non-owlish about them I can see is the ability to rotate the eyes, but it's a cartoon bird with no neck to turn 275 degrees in either direction, so that's a nominal detail. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 22:29, 10 March 2018 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 22:29, March 10, 2018
Is wingo a Flaptor? I mean yeah it sounds wierd, but aren't flaptors like: Iconic new enemies? And wingo is a bird and all- they aren't too similar but normally a boss is a kind of enemy, like Bowser is a Koopa, King Boo is a Boo, Petey is a etc... I know: Speculation, but what do you guys think? Toadbrigade5 (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2014 (EDT)
Tweeter? Really?
I don't see it. Like at all. Sorry. They behave differently and frankly don't look a like at all. Toadbrigade5 (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2014 (EDT)
I agree, I removed it. --
Too Bad! Waluigi Time! 12:30, 22 December 2014 (EST)
Category
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Should I put this under the more-specific Category:Owls? It looks like a stylized owl, what with the flat circular face and all. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2018 (EST)
- I agree that they look very owl-like.
Mario JC 22:23, 10 March 2018 (EST)
- The only thing that is non-owlish about them I can see is the ability to rotate the eyes, but it's a cartoon bird with no neck to turn 275 degrees in either direction, so that's a nominal detail. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 22:29, 10 March 2018 (EST)
