MarioWiki talk:Mushroom World Encyclopedia: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (→Inactivity) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{talk}} | {{talk}} | ||
I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. [[Special:Contributions/46.85.79.44|46.85.79.44]] 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST) | I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. [[Special:Contributions/46.85.79.44|46.85.79.44]] 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST) | ||
:Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST) | :Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:41, December 6, 2017
Inactivity
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I think "mariowiki.net" should be marked as (inactive) because of it's inactivity, and small amount of Inactivity. It could be useful for users who click on it. 46.85.79.44 12:36, 6 December 2017 (EST)
- Doesn't matter if a site is inactive or not as long as it is still up and has the info we're looking for. As a wiki, it could become active at any moment, so it would probably be pointless to mark it. For example, we don't mark WarsWiki for being inactive despite it being locked.
12:38, 6 December 2017 (EST)
