Category talk:New levels: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Support: I feel goofy right now.)
Line 13: Line 13:
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|BBQ Turtle}} Ridiculous category, per all.
#{{User|BBQ Turtle}} Ridiculous category, per all.
#{{User|Ultimate Mr. L}} .............No luck comprehending the logical purpose of this category. What does "new" mean? Who cares what levels are considered "new"? How does this help navigation? What is the purpose of life? (Oh, wait, that last one I can answer: Waffles)


===Oppose===
===Oppose===


===Comments===
===Comments===

Revision as of 15:12, November 8, 2017

Delete this category

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, July 11, 2024, 15:20 GMT

What a bizarre category. It's oddly specific, only being used for levels that are unique for the remake of an older game. At the same time, though, it's overly broad, lumping together levels from different games solely because they're "new" (by some technical definition of the word) without any consideration for the levels' role within their games (as an in-game bonus, as a required stage, as something obtained through outside means, etc.). I sincerely doubt that anyone cares solely about the remake-exclusive levels of every game to the point that a category would help them. Besides, the remake-exclusive levels are more than obvious: in Donkey Kong Country 3: Dixie Kong's Double Trouble!, they're the levels under Pacifica, in Yoshi's Island: Super Mario Advance 3, they're the extra levels, in Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3, they're under World-e, and it follows for the rest. This doesn't help anyone navigate in the slightest, and we shouldn't need to cater to every single remote detail.

Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: November 22, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. Time Turner (talk) Per proposal.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk) lol category
  3. Chester Alan Arthur (talk) This category doesn't really help navigation at all so per all.
  4. Toadette the Achiever (talk) The Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 e-Reader levels are better served under something like Category:Super Mario Advance 4: Super Mario Bros. 3 e-Reader Levels. Hopefully you can see where I'm going with this.
  5. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
  6. BBQ Turtle (talk) Ridiculous category, per all.
  7. Ultimate Mr. L (talk) .............No luck comprehending the logical purpose of this category. What does "new" mean? Who cares what levels are considered "new"? How does this help navigation? What is the purpose of life? (Oh, wait, that last one I can answer: Waffles)

Oppose

Comments