Talk:Stump Petuni: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: If we have an article on freaking [[Old Man Skoo]], a character only mentioned once in a game and that have no relavance to the plot, I think this can stay. | : If we have an article on freaking [[Old Man Skoo]], a character only mentioned once in a game and that have no relavance to the plot, I think this can stay. | ||
[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] | [[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] | ||
==Merge this article to [[Petuni]]== | |||
{{TPP}} | |||
This is not a minigame. This is a dialogue prompt with no flourishes to it. [[Petuni]] calls it "Stump Petuni" because she is the kind of spritely character who would add that kind of dramatization to her dialogue, not because she was declaring that this was a set-in-stone and very important game. It's not as if there's so much information to this article that it needs to be split, which should be apparent, and it's not as if this game plays such an important role in the story that it needs to have a separate article. Heck, [[Chuck Quizmo]]'s entire quiz show isn't even split from his article; how does this take priority over that? | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Time Turner}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': September 28, 2017, 23:59 GMT | |||
===Support=== | |||
#{{User|Time Turner}} I've made a statement indicating that I support my proposal. | |||
===Oppose=== | |||
===Comments=== | |||
Revision as of 12:27, September 14, 2017
Do we relly need this? Mr. Guy the Guy
Talk!
- If we have an article on freaking Old Man Skoo, a character only mentioned once in a game and that have no relavance to the plot, I think this can stay.
Merge this article to Petuni
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, November 8, 2024, 22:32 GMT
This is not a minigame. This is a dialogue prompt with no flourishes to it. Petuni calls it "Stump Petuni" because she is the kind of spritely character who would add that kind of dramatization to her dialogue, not because she was declaring that this was a set-in-stone and very important game. It's not as if there's so much information to this article that it needs to be split, which should be apparent, and it's not as if this game plays such an important role in the story that it needs to have a separate article. Heck, Chuck Quizmo's entire quiz show isn't even split from his article; how does this take priority over that?
Proposer: Time Turner (talk)
Deadline: September 28, 2017, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Time Turner (talk) I've made a statement indicating that I support my proposal.
