Template talk:Character infobox: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I don't think so. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 15:59, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | I don't think so. {{User:Plumber/Pignature}} 15:59, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Minor? Major? What? == | |||
Should we remove the Importance area of the template, since it seems a bit opinionated? For example, Waluigi is one of the most recurring characters in the Marioverse, yet he isn't one bit important to Mario main adventures. And people like Parakarry (who unfortunately isn't as recurring) is a pretty important character (Mario couldn't clear the rest of the game without his infamous carry ability). So should we perhaps remove the section, to be fair?{{User:Knife/sig}} 14:25, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:25, August 2, 2007
It depends if people want to use it.Knife (talk) 16:47, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
*embarrased* I completely forgot about this. I'll recruit some people in the chat soon. Wa 
TC@Y 15:28, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
- This should only be used on major characters. I don't think characters like the Paper Mario series partners or the Smash Bros. characters deserve the infobox. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 14:19, 22 July 2007 (EDT)
Define Appearances
Do cameos or mentions count as an appearance? For example, the PM partners had cameo appearances on Catch Cards, but does that mean we add that as their latest appearance?Knife (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
I don't think so. 
15:59, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
Minor? Major? What?
Should we remove the Importance area of the template, since it seems a bit opinionated? For example, Waluigi is one of the most recurring characters in the Marioverse, yet he isn't one bit important to Mario main adventures. And people like Parakarry (who unfortunately isn't as recurring) is a pretty important character (Mario couldn't clear the rest of the game without his infamous carry ability). So should we perhaps remove the section, to be fair?Knife (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
