Talk:Boo: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Booth of us have reviewed.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{PAIRreview | {{PAIRreview | ||
|A-rating=2.0 | |A-rating=2.0 | ||
|A-comment=The speculation in this article is what really killed the score. | |A-comment=The speculation and POV in this article is what really killed the score. | ||
|D-rating=2.0 | |D-rating=2.0 | ||
|D-comment=Some one-liners, the depth isn't that great. To fix this, writers should add a little info on the sub-species that were also present in the game. Also, some sections are unorganized. Why is the Paper Mario section at the bottom? | |D-comment=Some one-liners, the depth isn't that great. To fix this, writers should add a little info on the sub-species that were also present in the game. Also, some sections are unorganized. Why is the Paper Mario section at the bottom? | ||
|G-rating=3.0 | |G-rating=3.0 | ||
|G-comment=Grammar is a little | |G-comment=Grammar is a little off in a few areas and can get confusing. | ||
|I-rating=3.5 | |I-rating=3.5 | ||
|I-comment=A few more would help, but the aligning is still not very nice to look at. | |I-comment=A few more would help, but the aligning is still not very nice to look at. | ||
Revision as of 15:10, July 31, 2007
| PAIRreview for Boo by Gofer | ||
| Accuracy | 2.5 | Relatively accurate, the only really major error I found was the "Streche are boo with long body." thing. There's a few minor error, but nothing glaring. |
| Depth | 2.0 | I found the "What make a Boo a Boo." section quite nice, especially considering than th past Fa Goomba didn't have such a thing. UNfortunately, most of the section is pretty much speculation (The "Bigger Hideout = More powerful Boo" thing is an example.) As for the article,It could use some depth, for example, the SMRPG section don't have much information while the same section on Big Boo have load and load of information. The SUper Paper Mario section is welll, an one-liner, unnceptable. It also lack much information for the spinoff game, esspecially Mario Striker charged. |
| Grammar | 3.0 | I let soemone else review that. |
| Images | 3.0 | Good, The article could use some more, IMO. |
| Formatting | 4.0 | Good, no problem here. |
| Final Rating: | 14.5 | Slighty above average, not FA worthy.Full of POV and speculation, also. |
| Reviewer: | Gofer | |
| PAIRreview for Boo by Knife | ||
| Accuracy | 2.0 | The speculation and POV in this article is what really killed the score. |
| Depth | 2.0 | Some one-liners, the depth isn't that great. To fix this, writers should add a little info on the sub-species that were also present in the game. Also, some sections are unorganized. Why is the Paper Mario section at the bottom? |
| Grammar | 3.0 | Grammar is a little off in a few areas and can get confusing. |
| Images | 3.5 | A few more would help, but the aligning is still not very nice to look at. |
| Formatting | 3.5 | Slight, minor problems like some &ndashs are missing in the list of subspecies and perhaps a scroll box is needed to cut down the size from templates. |
| Final Rating: | 14 | An average article, but will need a lot of work before it can even get nominated. |
| Reviewer: | Knife | |
How are Boos part of the Koopa Troop? They might not directly help Bowser, but just attack Mario when he is in a ghost house or is in their territory. There isn't enough (or no) proof that Boos or its subspecies are part of Bowser's minions.Knife (talk)
To Gofer: Remember to have your rankings in .5 steps (see here). You should round up your .9 rating. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 13:40, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
