MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kart: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Comments: Removing redundant category) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated= | |nominated=20:16, 22 July 2014 | ||
| | |lastedit=10:35, 23 June, 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} I' | #{{User|Tails777}} I don't see anything wrong with the article so it can stay featured. | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT) | ||
Okay' okay' you guys made me do this. I have no choice. {{User:Joseph/sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:23, February 9, 2017
Kart[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Why? It looks fine.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???
- Tails777 (talk) I don't see anything wrong with the article so it can stay featured.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
Okay' okay' you guys made me do this. I have no choice. Joseph (talk) (contribs) 
