MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Culex: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→Comments: Removing redundant category) |
||
| (40 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated= April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT | |nominated=April 2, 2014 17:30 GMT | ||
| | |lastedit=May 2, 17:30, 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy? | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}} This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy). | |||
#{{User|smarty54242}} This article isn't even written that well. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} Length doesn't always matter. We have [[Macho Grubba|shorter]] [[Koopa Bros.|articles]] [[Kolorado|than]] this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it. | |||
#{{User|bluetoad63}} Per Tails. | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. {{User|Yoshi876}} | No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. {{User|Yoshi876}} | ||
I just got rid of it, on my own. {{User:Bluetoad63/sig}} 13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
::Ok, then {{User:Ashley and Red/sig}} | |||
::While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. [[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain. {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
:::Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly. {{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
We have Macho Grubba, Koopa Bros. and Kolarado. These are featured and shorter than culex. [[User:Waluigi men are as weoseme|Waluigi men are as weoseme]] ([[User talk:Waluigi men are as weoseme|talk]]) 08:26, 3 May 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:21, February 9, 2017
Culex[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy?
- Ashley and Red (talk) This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).
- smarty54242 (talk) This article isn't even written that well.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- Tails777 (talk) Length doesn't always matter. We have shorter articles than this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
- bluetoad63 (talk) Per Tails.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. Yoshi876 (talk)
I just got rid of it, on my own. 
Bluetoad63
13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
- Ok, then User:Ashley and Red/sig
- While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. Vommack (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
- Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 19:12, 3 April 2014 (EDT) - Mario has a point, it's not likely to be a coincidence this kind of character appears in a Square Enix game. It could be trimmed, possibly.
Lord G. matters. 00:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT)
- Well, we can't simply remove the information because this stuff important and can explain why Culex seems so unfitting for a Mario character. This is a rare case where we need to explain.
We have Macho Grubba, Koopa Bros. and Kolarado. These are featured and shorter than culex. Waluigi men are as weoseme (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2014 (EDT)
