MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Queen Bee: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
(→Comments: Removing redundant category) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=00:45, 4 March 2014 | |nominated=00:45, 4 March 2014 | ||
| | |lastedit=00:45, 3 April 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} There's really nothing to expand (besides the intro, which is a crucial aspect of an FA), but at the same time, the article simply seems too small. | #{{User|Time Turner}} There's really nothing to expand (besides the intro, which is a crucial aspect of an FA), but at the same time, the article simply seems too small. | ||
#{{User|Daisyluva99}}Well,this article could use some work...I'd probably do it if I could ever find some free time. | #{{User|Daisyluva99}}Well,this article could use some work...I'd probably do it if I could ever find some free time. | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Very short. Per Epic Rosalina. | |||
#{{User|Fandro}} Per Epic Rosalina and Time Turner. | |||
#{{user|Lumoshi}} Per all. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 15:51, February 9, 2017
Queen Bee[edit]
Support[edit]
- Mr. Game & Watch (talk) This article is a good candidate for a featured article for lots of reasons. There is no flowery writing that I could find, no red links, decent grammar, and nearly every section has at least one picture (which has been a problem with recent nominations). Honestly, I don't see why this shouldn't be featured.
Oppose[edit]
- Epic Rosalina (talk) I hate to say this, but the article seems... short. It looks shorter than the Baby DK article, and despite the good quality, it needs some expanding first.
- Time Turner (talk) There's really nothing to expand (besides the intro, which is a crucial aspect of an FA), but at the same time, the article simply seems too small.
- Daisyluva99 (talk)Well,this article could use some work...I'd probably do it if I could ever find some free time.
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Very short. Per Epic Rosalina.
- Fandro (talk) Per Epic Rosalina and Time Turner.
- Lumoshi (talk) Per all.
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
The opening paragraph is way too small, and that one picture under the Super Mario Galaxy 2 section bothers me. It's all distorted and low-resolution. Mario (talk)
- I made the paragraph a bit bigger, but that was the only okay-ish looking picture I could find of her in SMG2, so I can't help you there. Mr. Game & Watch (talk)
@EpicRosalina it's larger than Baby Donkey Kong, it's 9173 bytes. I'd say it's of a reasonable size. Yoshi876 (talk)
But it could still use some expanding. Epic Rosalina (talk)
