Gallery talk:Mario: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Possible split?: new section)
m (→‎Possible split?: It's just Mario that has this problem, really.)
Line 28: Line 28:


{{talk}}
{{talk}}
This page is large. Very, very large. 87,131 bytes of almost nothing but images, which makes the page take a loooong time to load. Is it alright to split this gallery (maybe those with just as long a gallery like [[Gallery:Luigi|Luigi]]'s)? Split into {{fakelink|Gallery:Mario1}}, which has all 1.4.4 sections of the artwork, and {{fakelink|Gallery:Mario2}}, which has everything else? I realize this is fairly unconventional, though it's certainly possible, and it would make loading times shorter and easier. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:58, 16 January 2017 (EST)
This page is large. Very, very large. 87,131 bytes of almost nothing but images, which makes the page take a loooong time to load. Is it alright to split this gallery, maybe split into {{fakelink|Gallery:Mario1}}, which has all 1.4.4 sections of the artwork, and {{fakelink|Gallery:Mario2}}, which has everything else? I realize this is fairly unconventional, though it's certainly possible, and it would make loading times shorter and easier. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 17:58, 16 January 2017 (EST)

Revision as of 19:19, January 16, 2017

Power-Up Artworks

I think the artworks of Mario's forms should be removed from this gallery since there is no power-up forms of Luigi on his gallery. I think we should create gallery called Gallery:Mario and Luigi's Forms, or something like that.--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png

Why can't they be here? I mean powered up or not, they are still forms of Mario, also Luigi's gallery should be fixed to include power-up forms too. Mario riding YoshiXzelionETC
Well I guess that makes sense, but wouldn't the gallery be cluttered cuz I also need to put in many and many upload sprites of Mario + many sprites of his power-ups, which makes this gallery really massive.--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png
Is having a big gallery really a bad thing? Wouldn't it be a good thing? Mario riding YoshiXzelionETC (maybe forms can have they're own section?)
I know having a big gallery is a good thing, but getting it so mildly large up to the point of lagging is sorta a bad thing.--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png
Should we remove the Fire Mario artworks atleast as Fire Mario now has his own gallery?--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png
Anyone agree?--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png
Yes. I do. Tadaa!2.gifSupremoTadaaa!.gif
Ok, I guess I should remove Ice Mario as well as he has a gallery too.--UM3000 E-102 Gamma.png

Why can't we add forms, like Ice Mario Hammer Mario and Gold Mario to Fire Mario's gallery in their own section, called Similar Forms or something like that? --User:Davey/sig

You add new comments at the bottom instead of haphazardly lumping it in the middle of the discussion. Anyway, I brought up it at one point via forum post, and it's generally agreed that we don't add power-ups and stuff because they are in another gallery and article. This would keep the size, clutter, and repetition down while maintaining focus on Mario rather than his power-ups. Mario's gallery is huge as it is, we don't need even more images that can serve elsewhere. Mario It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 13:20, 26 February 2016 (EST)

New Image

Mario dancing from Mario & Luigi: Superstar SagaShould that be on the page? It's from Superstar Saga.PikaSamus (talk)

If no one argues... PikaSamus (talk)

Could someone please add the Mercades commercial to the Live action section?

Title says all. Just a screencap or two would do, perhaps one from the first commercial and one from the recent second commercial. Other than that, I don't think this page is missing anything. --User:Hateater12/sig

Regarding Mario's Smash Render

His Smash render is both the Offical Artwork section and the Sprites/Models section. Shouldn't that be changed, because the render isn't a in game model. Rosalina Icon (unselected) Rosetta The Fanboy Rosalina Icon (unselected) 04:11, 20 February 2015 (EST)

Possible split?

? Block from Super Mario World This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

This page is large. Very, very large. 87,131 bytes of almost nothing but images, which makes the page take a loooong time to load. Is it alright to split this gallery, maybe split into Template:Fakelink, which has all 1.4.4 sections of the artwork, and Template:Fakelink, which has everything else? I realize this is fairly unconventional, though it's certainly possible, and it would make loading times shorter and easier. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 17:58, 16 January 2017 (EST)