MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ||
'''The RPG Gamer''' | |||
#{{User|Time Turner}} The oppose vote only addresses the issue of poor writing, although it only claims that it doesn't need to be rewritten despite it not having changed this entire time. It does not address the issue of brevity and the issue of fluff. | #{{User|Time Turner}} The oppose vote only addresses the issue of poor writing, although it only claims that it doesn't need to be rewritten despite it not having changed this entire time. It does not address the issue of brevity and the issue of fluff. | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 20:33, November 7, 2016
Rawk Hawk
Remove featured article status
- Time Turner (talk) The intro paragraph is literally two sentences long. Both the Background and Powers and Abilities sections suffer the same issues of brevity, and the section covering TTYD covers far more than necessary while not being particularly well-written (beyond the tense issues, the article wrings as much fluff as it can out of every moment, which is to the article's detriment). Even if the writing was polished, there isn't much to be said about the character; there isn't enough content here to actually justify touting it as one of the wiki's best.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Time Turner
- AfternoonLight (talk) Per both. Let's get rid of it.
- Alex95 (talk) One time characters are certainly difficult to write a good article on, as there really isn't much to go off of. Unfortunately, Rawk's is one such article.
- 3D Player 2010 (talk) Per all
Keep featured article status
- The RPG Gamer (talk) This article explains Rawk Hawk's traits perfectly and has a lot of information on him, no section of the article needs to be rewritten either so I don't see anything wrong in having it featured.
Removal of support/oppose votes
The RPG Gamer
- Time Turner (talk) The oppose vote only addresses the issue of poor writing, although it only claims that it doesn't need to be rewritten despite it not having changed this entire time. It does not address the issue of brevity and the issue of fluff.
