MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive/3: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
< MarioWiki:Appeals | Archive
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(Decision + archiving) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive template|main=yes}} | {{MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive template|main=yes}} | ||
===Ultimate Mr. L=== | |||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">WARNING OVERTURNED</span> | |||
<br><small>The warning will be overturned '''for this case only''' as the particular wording of {{tem|Reminder}} is in Ultimate Mr. L's advantage; however, the template will be edited to prevent this from ever being an excuse again.</small> | |||
*[[User talk:Ultimate Mr. L#Image Category Reminder]] | |||
====Ultimate Mr. L==== | |||
*The Warning I am appealing can be found in the middle of the linked section of my talk page. I am not appealing the reminder at the top.[[User:Wildgoosespeeder|Wildgoosespeeder]] ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder|Talk]]) gave the warning because I was forgetting to categorize images. At first I thought I deserved it because it was getting annoying for him, but then I realized that reminders say, and I quote, '''If the action continues deliberately, then a warning will be issued.''' I was not deliberately forgetting to categorize those images. It was all accidental. If I'm not doing it on purpose, should a warning be issued? | |||
====Wildgoosespeeder==== | |||
*This whole situation is awkward. I like to think of the warning as trying to enforce the rules more so than punishing the user. This is the best way I could do that without having sysop powers. I used it after talking with him several times (in between {{tem|imagecategory-reminder}} and {{tem|warning}}) and he still failed to follow [[MarioWiki:Categories|policy]]. Initially, I tried to give some leeway before issuing {{tem|warning}} because he was responding and being polite about it. | |||
---- | |||
Revision as of 16:20, November 1, 2016
MarioWiki:Appeals/Archive template
Ultimate Mr. L
WARNING OVERTURNED
The warning will be overturned for this case only as the particular wording of {{Reminder}} is in Ultimate Mr. L's advantage; however, the template will be edited to prevent this from ever being an excuse again.
Ultimate Mr. L
- The Warning I am appealing can be found in the middle of the linked section of my talk page. I am not appealing the reminder at the top.Wildgoosespeeder (Talk) gave the warning because I was forgetting to categorize images. At first I thought I deserved it because it was getting annoying for him, but then I realized that reminders say, and I quote, If the action continues deliberately, then a warning will be issued. I was not deliberately forgetting to categorize those images. It was all accidental. If I'm not doing it on purpose, should a warning be issued?
Wildgoosespeeder
- This whole situation is awkward. I like to think of the warning as trying to enforce the rules more so than punishing the user. This is the best way I could do that without having sysop powers. I used it after talking with him several times (in between {{imagecategory-reminder}} and {{warning}}) and he still failed to follow policy. Initially, I tried to give some leeway before issuing {{warning}} because he was responding and being polite about it.
