Talk:Banana Coin: Difference between revisions
m (→Comments) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
Doesn't the first rule say that you need a strong argument? (rhetorical) Because this is a proposal for a split of the subjects (since they are already together) and there is no strong evidence for it, just a counterevidence. Or is the evidence somewhere else (in which case, the evidence needs to be linked to the article). {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 16:44, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | Doesn't the first rule say that you need a strong argument? (rhetorical) Because this is a proposal for a split of the subjects (since they are already together) and there is no strong evidence for it, just a counterevidence. Or is the evidence somewhere else (in which case, the evidence needs to be linked to the article). {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 16:44, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
I'm actually really confused right now. They are currently merged, but this is a proposal to split them and your opposing your own proposal to split them? I don't mean to be rude or anything, but am I missing something here or did you just create a proposal on splitting them, only to oppose it? Again, I don't mean to be rude, I'm just confused. {{User:Tails777/sig}}16:53, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:53, September 25, 2016
Sorry if it isn't all true. I wasn't completely sure about the country 3 part. Frum LANKY KONG ! 
Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 20:26 GMT
I do not agree with this proposal, as the only difference between a Banana Bunch Coin and a Banana Coin is that the former has a picture of a banana bunch on it, the other has a single banana. They both share the same purpose within the DK games, giving them to the supporting Kong(s) to pay up for their offered service.
Proposer: A51_Trooper (talk)
Deadline: October 9, 2016 at 23:59 GMT
Support
Oppose
- A51_Trooper (talk) Per my proposal.
- YoshiKong (talk) – Per proposal. The function is the same, being the form of currency. Appearance alone shouldn't always justify a split. And I feel that it would make it more difficult to navigate between two articles, when the subject's appearance is so inconstant and continues to change from game to game.
Comments
Doesn't the first rule say that you need a strong argument? (rhetorical) Because this is a proposal for a split of the subjects (since they are already together) and there is no strong evidence for it, just a counterevidence. Or is the evidence somewhere else (in which case, the evidence needs to be linked to the article). 
Yoshi the SSM (talk) 16:44, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
I'm actually really confused right now. They are currently merged, but this is a proposal to split them and your opposing your own proposal to split them? I don't mean to be rude or anything, but am I missing something here or did you just create a proposal on splitting them, only to oppose it? Again, I don't mean to be rude, I'm just confused. 
Tails777 Talk to me!
16:53, 25 September 2016 (EDT)
