MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bob-omb: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
{{FANOMFAIL
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
|nominated=22:05, May 17th 2012
{{FANOMSTAT
|lastedit=22:05, 16 July 2012
|nominated=<!--List the time of nomination; i.e. the time this page is created. Remember to use GMT as a standard time. -->
|nosupport=true
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#[[User:Super Nintendo 64|Super Nintendo 64]][[User talk:Super Nintendo 64|(talk)]] I should feature this article because there's a whole lot of info & images that, I just want to nominate it as featured!
#[[User:Super Nintendo 64|Super Nintendo 64]][[User talk:Super Nintendo 64|(talk)]] I should feature this article because there's a whole lot of info & images that, I just want to nominate it as featured!
#{{User|Lost Mini Star09}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Spenzer66}}
#{{User|Tanookitoad}}
#{{User|MarioManiac164}}
#{{User|Jacob Koopa}}  


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 19: Line 21:
#{{User|Vommack}} Per LGM.
#{{User|Vommack}} Per LGM.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per Raven Effect.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Per Raven Effect.
#{{User|Cortez}} Per all.
#{{User|Koopa K}} Per Raven Effect and LGM.
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}} Per Shoey.
#{{user|Mrcrackerpants}} Yeah, I don't get why it's a featured article if it has a re-write request.
#{{user|Bowser45}} Per Raven Effect


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
Line 36: Line 41:
:::::Then remember it!!! {{User|Lost Mini Star09}}
:::::Then remember it!!! {{User|Lost Mini Star09}}
::::::There's no need to shout at me for doing something that has no impact on you. {{User|GreenDisaster}}
::::::There's no need to shout at me for doing something that has no impact on you. {{User|GreenDisaster}}
:::::::Please, I '' know '' the Mario Party section needed expansion. {{User|Lost Mini Star09}}
::::::::If the Mario Party section needs expansion then why support it? Aren't FAs supposed to be pretty much perfect? {{User|Koopa K}}

Latest revision as of 10:58, September 14, 2016

Bob-omb was nominated for Featured Article status at 22:05, May 17th 2012.

Bob-omb failed FA status requirements at 22:05, 16 July 2012, and can currently be renominated.

Support[edit]

  1. Super Nintendo 64(talk) I should feature this article because there's a whole lot of info & images that, I just want to nominate it as featured!
  2. Mariobros1985 (talk)
  3. Spenzer66 (talk)
  4. Tanookitoad (talk)
  5. MarioManiac164 (talk)
  6. Jacob Koopa (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Raven Effect (talk) It has a rewrite template on it therefore it can't be featured.
  2. GreenDisaster (talk) It has a very well deserved rewrite-expand template. Per LGM's comment.
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk) Hello, Rewrite Template
  4. Matik2002 (talk) Guys, i agree that it has the rewrite template.
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Please look at my comment below. We need a better explanation for why this article has a rewrite template or else anybody can simply remove it and make your votes invalid.
  6. Mario4Ever (talk) Per LGM.
  7. Vommack (talk) Per LGM.
  8. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per Raven Effect.
  9. Koopa K (talk) Per Raven Effect and LGM.
  10. New Super Yoshi (talk) Per Shoey.
  11. Mrcrackerpants (talk) Yeah, I don't get why it's a featured article if it has a re-write request.
  12. Bowser45 (talk) Per Raven Effect

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

FORGET THE REWRITE TEMPLATE!!!Lost Mini Star09

Featured articles are not based on the character themselves, but rather the quality of the articles they have. The rules for featuring an article clearly state that articles cannot be featured with an improvement template on them. GreenDisaster (talk)

I accept with GreenDisaster: this is based on quality. Also it cannot have a stub template, under construction template and rewrite (and expand, if needed) template. --Matik2002 (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2012 (EDT)

Well, when people just mention the rewrite template, it doesn't really help in any way. I think it's a very weak and not constructive argument. Right now, I see some problems that lead to the rewrite template. The Mario Party section definitely needs expansion. The Game & Watch series needs to be merged into one section to remove all those one-liners. Also, I have a feeling that this article needs some sections, such as appearances in the comic books. I have some feeling that Bob-ombs did make some appearances in those sorts. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Thank you, LGM. Glad someone's on my side! Lost Mini Star09 (talk)
He's still opposing it. He's not on your side, he's saying that "it has a rewrite template" isn't a very good reason. GreenDisaster (talk)
LGM is female. Mario4Ever (talk)
I know that, I just keep forgetting it. GreenDisaster (talk)
Then remember it!!! Lost Mini Star09 (talk)
There's no need to shout at me for doing something that has no impact on you. GreenDisaster (talk)
Please, I know the Mario Party section needed expansion. Lost Mini Star09 (talk)
If the Mario Party section needs expansion then why support it? Aren't FAs supposed to be pretty much perfect? Koopa K (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Bob-omb&oldid=2056559"