Talk:Zero Suit Samus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:Is this relevant to the article in question? I don't mean to be rude, but this sounds like speculation for a forum thread. Anyways, I think we should wait for the game to come out before we start comparing characteristics to be mentioned in articles. [[User:♥♪!?|♥♪!?]] 10:53, 19 July 2007 (EDT) | :Is this relevant to the article in question? I don't mean to be rude, but this sounds like speculation for a forum thread. Anyways, I think we should wait for the game to come out before we start comparing characteristics to be mentioned in articles. [[User:♥♪!?|♥♪!?]] 10:53, 19 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
::I am aware that this, before it is confirmed, is not relevant to the article and should be a forum question. After all, these rules from Wikipedia are not all too strict here. Meh... - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 10:55, 19 July 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 09:55, July 19, 2007
So she's sort of like a costume?-- Aipom --
Nah, a transformation, like Sheik. Gofer
So she won't have her own space?-- Aipom --
- Probably not. That is, when you do not have the option to start as her without the power suit. In SSBM, you needed a secret trick to start battles as Sheik. :\ - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:02, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
The new Sheik?
Has anyone noticed the similarities in the attack pattern of Sheik and Zero Suit Samus? It seems to be very similar in the trailers and images (those handstands when attacking upwards for example). Zero Suit Samus even seens to have her own version of the Chain attack. Considering that it is very unlikely for Sheik to return, it seems plausible to me. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 10:47, 19 July 2007 (EDT)
- Is this relevant to the article in question? I don't mean to be rude, but this sounds like speculation for a forum thread. Anyways, I think we should wait for the game to come out before we start comparing characteristics to be mentioned in articles. ♥♪!? 10:53, 19 July 2007 (EDT)