Category talk:Cloned: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::I'd hardly complain if this category was ditched, but to an extent, [[:Category:Magicians|Category:Magicians]] is a collection of people who can use magic. Next to the actual magicians/witches/witch doctors/genies/magic-based generic enemies, the category also includes characters who merely own magical devices (such as the [[Koopalings]] and [[King Windbag]]), characters with unexplained abilities (such as [[Master Hand]] and [[Wingo]]), and [[Mario]] and [[Luigi]] are also there for some reason. The category has merit, but it's worth retooling that category, imo. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | ::I'd hardly complain if this category was ditched, but to an extent, [[:Category:Magicians|Category:Magicians]] is a collection of people who can use magic. Next to the actual magicians/witches/witch doctors/genies/magic-based generic enemies, the category also includes characters who merely own magical devices (such as the [[Koopalings]] and [[King Windbag]]), characters with unexplained abilities (such as [[Master Hand]] and [[Wingo]]), and [[Mario]] and [[Luigi]] are also there for some reason. The category has merit, but it's worth retooling that category, imo. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | ||
:::We'll probably have to redefine the magician category but that one is worth keeping. This one isn't. As for Mario being there, I guess it has to do with [[:File:SMAS.jpg|his ''Super Mario All-Stars'' appearance]] or maybe that [[:File:Mario GameWatchGallery 3.png|sprite from ''Game & Watch Gallery 3'']]. Not sure about Luigi. That's another topic, though. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:19, 2 April 2016 (EDT) | :::We'll probably have to redefine the magician category but that one is worth keeping. This one isn't. As for Mario being there, I guess it has to do with [[:File:SMAS.jpg|his ''Super Mario All-Stars'' appearance]] or maybe that [[:File:Mario GameWatchGallery 3.png|sprite from ''Game & Watch Gallery 3'']]. Not sure about Luigi. That's another topic, though. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:19, 2 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
[[:Category:Clones]] can replaced this "Cloned" category. I think we should only be categorizing characters who were created to be a clone, not characters who have been cloned sometime the the past. | |||
{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 16:54, 1 August 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:54, August 1, 2016
This page's existence
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Um, any particular reason we need to categorize people on abilities they do? It's like categorizing "characters who can breath fire" or "characters who use magic". 
Ray Trace(T|C) 14:56, 2 April 2016 (EDT)
- This is a small throw-away list with little practical purpose, kind of like other poor categories from 2008. I'd say it's around the same level of "Characters who have kissed Mario". I don't think any of us will miss it.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 19:31, 2 April 2016 (EDT)
- I'd hardly complain if this category was ditched, but to an extent, Category:Magicians is a collection of people who can use magic. Next to the actual magicians/witches/witch doctors/genies/magic-based generic enemies, the category also includes characters who merely own magical devices (such as the Koopalings and King Windbag), characters with unexplained abilities (such as Master Hand and Wingo), and Mario and Luigi are also there for some reason. The category has merit, but it's worth retooling that category, imo. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- We'll probably have to redefine the magician category but that one is worth keeping. This one isn't. As for Mario being there, I guess it has to do with his Super Mario All-Stars appearance or maybe that sprite from Game & Watch Gallery 3. Not sure about Luigi. That's another topic, though. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:19, 2 April 2016 (EDT)
- We'll probably have to redefine the magician category but that one is worth keeping. This one isn't. As for Mario being there, I guess it has to do with his Super Mario All-Stars appearance or maybe that sprite from Game & Watch Gallery 3. Not sure about Luigi. That's another topic, though.
- I'd hardly complain if this category was ditched, but to an extent, Category:Magicians is a collection of people who can use magic. Next to the actual magicians/witches/witch doctors/genies/magic-based generic enemies, the category also includes characters who merely own magical devices (such as the Koopalings and King Windbag), characters with unexplained abilities (such as Master Hand and Wingo), and Mario and Luigi are also there for some reason. The category has merit, but it's worth retooling that category, imo. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Category:Clones can replaced this "Cloned" category. I think we should only be categorizing characters who were created to be a clone, not characters who have been cloned sometime the the past.
