Template talk:Multiple image: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(no! don't delete, this works perfectly here.) |
(→Update to allow specifying height or width+height?: new section) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
That's cuz the mariowiki is powered by the mediawiki, therefore some functions that work in wikipedia may work here (sure, NOT all). I was attempting to do this but looks like you did t early :P {{User:Coincollector/sig}} | That's cuz the mariowiki is powered by the mediawiki, therefore some functions that work in wikipedia may work here (sure, NOT all). I was attempting to do this but looks like you did t early :P {{User:Coincollector/sig}} | ||
== Update to allow specifying height or width+height? == | |||
{{talk}} | |||
[[mediawiki.org:Help:Images#Rendering a single image]] says there are four ways to specify a size for an image. Should the code be updated to allow for this? [[SNES]] has this issue. It would make the Super Famicom section look much better. Does this mean we have to update {{tem|multiframe}} as well? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 20:43, 9 July 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 19:43, July 9, 2016
Del
{{multiframe}} obsoleted it. I think it's too complicated and very much like Wp's one.SWFlash
That's cuz the mariowiki is powered by the mediawiki, therefore some functions that work in wikipedia may work here (sure, NOT all). I was attempting to do this but looks like you did t early :P ¢oincoll€ctor
Update to allow specifying height or width+height?
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
mediawiki.org:Help:Images#Rendering a single image says there are four ways to specify a size for an image. Should the code be updated to allow for this? SNES has this issue. It would make the Super Famicom section look much better. Does this mean we have to update {{multiframe}} as well? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 20:43, 9 July 2016 (EDT)