Template talk:Br: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Megadardery (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::Besides that having it in the template is easier maintenance as said, using <code>clear=all</code> on a <code>BR</code> is obsolete with HTML5. This template uses the correct coding, in addition to not even using a <code>BR</code>. {{User:Lakituthequick/sig}} 14:40, 19 January 2016 (EST) | :::Besides that having it in the template is easier maintenance as said, using <code>clear=all</code> on a <code>BR</code> is obsolete with HTML5. This template uses the correct coding, in addition to not even using a <code>BR</code>. {{User:Lakituthequick/sig}} 14:40, 19 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::The idea is, if the <nowiki><br clear=all></nowiki> is preceding the navigation templates, it should be replaced with {{tem|BoxTop}}, otherwise you can safely replace it with {{tem|br}}. But I think it's not worth it to mass edit all articles for such a minor change, instead, if you come by it while regularly editing, you can then replace it.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 15:05, 19 January 2016 (EST) | ::::The idea is, if the <nowiki><br clear=all></nowiki> is preceding the navigation templates, it should be replaced with {{tem|BoxTop}}, otherwise you can safely replace it with {{tem|br}}. But I think it's not worth it to mass edit all articles for such a minor change, instead, if you come by it while regularly editing, you can then replace it.--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 15:05, 19 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:::::Yeah, exactly what Megadardery said. Also keep in mind that it can be replaced with <nowiki>{{br|left}} or {{br|right}}</nowiki> when it seems appropriate: it often leads to neater-looking pages than just automatically clearing everything every time. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 15:59, 19 January 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:59, January 19, 2016
Usage
The template seems to be used in only two pages (check what links here). Shouldn't the template be used in articles...? 
RAP... *blink blink* 2 pages...
Replace?
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I see a lot of <br clear=all>. Should it be replaced with {{br}}? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 02:42, 18 January 2016 (EST)
- They're perfectly interchangeable, or at least so I believe. I think there's no point in changing all instances of <br clear=all>, both function the same. --
™ The 'Shroom 17:27, 18 January 2016 (EST)
- Wouldn't it make editing pages easier? Also if there is a problem with the source code of {{br}} or the raw code <br clear=all>, all pages that use the template will be corrected automatically. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 17:43, 18 January 2016 (EST)
- Besides that having it in the template is easier maintenance as said, using
clear=allon aBRis obsolete with HTML5. This template uses the correct coding, in addition to not even using aBR.
Lakituthequick 14:40, 19 January 2016 (EST)
- The idea is, if the <br clear=all> is preceding the navigation templates, it should be replaced with {{BoxTop}}, otherwise you can safely replace it with {{br}}. But I think it's not worth it to mass edit all articles for such a minor change, instead, if you come by it while regularly editing, you can then replace it.--15:05, 19 January 2016 (EST)
- The idea is, if the <br clear=all> is preceding the navigation templates, it should be replaced with {{BoxTop}}, otherwise you can safely replace it with {{br}}. But I think it's not worth it to mass edit all articles for such a minor change, instead, if you come by it while regularly editing, you can then replace it.--
- Besides that having it in the template is easier maintenance as said, using
- Wouldn't it make editing pages easier? Also if there is a problem with the source code of {{br}} or the raw code <br clear=all>, all pages that use the template will be corrected automatically. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 17:43, 18 January 2016 (EST)
