MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Neo Bowser City: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Comments) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
The only major differences between the two articles is that there is a Mario Kart 8 section. I don't know if that's the difference for a featured article. I just don't think this article is outstanding, though. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:21, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | The only major differences between the two articles is that there is a Mario Kart 8 section. I don't know if that's the difference for a featured article. I just don't think this article is outstanding, though. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:21, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
:While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 21:31, September 2, 2015
Neo Bowser City
Support
- ZonkMario64 (talk) Yes, I tried a year ago, but it only failed because it was too short. It is longer now, therefore I think it should be featured.
- PowerKamek (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
The only major differences between the two articles is that there is a Mario Kart 8 section. I don't know if that's the difference for a featured article. I just don't think this article is outstanding, though. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:21, 2 September 2015 (EDT)
- While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Tails777 Talk to me!
