Talk:Pokey Mummy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ninja Squid (talk | contribs) |
(→Merge Pokey Mummy with Poison Pokey: closing per proposer's request) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Merge Pokey Mummy with Poison Pokey == | == Merge Pokey Mummy with Poison Pokey == | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | |||
<span style="color:grey;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DELETED BY PROPOSER</span> | |||
They have the same color, the two have the ability to poison Mario. It's like they only rename the enemy like Forest Fuzzy and Green Fuzzy. So, why not? | They have the same color, the two have the ability to poison Mario. It's like they only rename the enemy like Forest Fuzzy and Green Fuzzy. So, why not? | ||
Revision as of 19:44, April 12, 2015
Merge Pokey Mummy with Poison Pokey
Template:SettledTPP DELETED BY PROPOSER
They have the same color, the two have the ability to poison Mario. It's like they only rename the enemy like Forest Fuzzy and Green Fuzzy. So, why not?
Proposer: LudwigVon (talk)
Deadline: April 23, 2015, 23:59 GMT
Support
Oppose
- LinkTheLefty (talk) - They have a similar coloration and some shared moves, but Pokey Mummies have the crypt gimmick that Poison Pokeys do not.
- SmokedChili (talk) - Different Japanese names, thus unlikely meant to be the same enemies.
- Binarystep (talk) Per all.
- Boo4761 (talk) Per all.
- Mario (talk) I say that one is supposed to be undead (since they appear from coffins, while the other is living), so the categorization is easier if we let the two article separate.
Comments
I finally agree with the comments of those who oppose, can I cancelled the proposal and how?--
(TALK) 19:48, 12 April 2015 (EDT)
