Template talk:Ref needed: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Nomenclature: new section) |
(→Nomenclature: outdated) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Nomenclature == | == Nomenclature == | ||
Considering that we used to have {{tem|fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{tem|fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{tem|refneeded}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{tem|fact}} or at least make a template redirect. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT) | Considering that we used to have {{tem|fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{tem|fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{tem|refneeded}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{tem|fact}} or at least make a template redirect. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:16, April 4, 2015
What is the difference between this and template:fact? HyperToad
Never mind. HyperToad
Releasedate
When putting this template into a {{releasedate}} template, it screws the releasedate one up. Is there a possible fix for that? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:16, 4 June 2009 (EDT)
Nomenclature
Considering that we used to have {{fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{refneeded}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{fact}} or at least make a template redirect. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
