MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N3/Kirby: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Yoshi876 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N/Kirby to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N2/Kirby: New proposal says that if problems are fixed/supports removed and no new problems presented in 1 week the nomination fails) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | |||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | |||
|nominated=23:10, 13 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by copying it from the history of the page.--> | |||
}} | |||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | |||
#{{User|Time Turner}} The fact that Smash 4 is basically completely missing from this article is already a huge strike against it (it's been a few months already, it's a valid point to make). No updated information, no new images, no descriptions of what's different... Besides that, though, the article has other problems; the moves have some noticeable tense issues (he ''can'' do this, he ''will'' do that, etc.), the Melee and Brawl sections are really short and what's there reeks of being poorly written, the Subspace Emissary is bloated with extraneous information, the images for the "forms" sections are wildly-different in size and quality and several images (the 3DS ones, for example) are clearly jagged, the profiles and statistics aren't well-organized, and to top it all off, the intro really isn't something that'd be used as an example of [[MarioWiki:Good Writing|Good Writing]]. Regardless of the fact that this article should have been updated a while ago, this shouldn't be a featured article. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | |||
==== Comments ==== | |||
Revision as of 22:10, March 13, 2015
Kirby
Remove Featured Article Status
- Time Turner (talk) The fact that Smash 4 is basically completely missing from this article is already a huge strike against it (it's been a few months already, it's a valid point to make). No updated information, no new images, no descriptions of what's different... Besides that, though, the article has other problems; the moves have some noticeable tense issues (he can do this, he will do that, etc.), the Melee and Brawl sections are really short and what's there reeks of being poorly written, the Subspace Emissary is bloated with extraneous information, the images for the "forms" sections are wildly-different in size and quality and several images (the 3DS ones, for example) are clearly jagged, the profiles and statistics aren't well-organized, and to top it all off, the intro really isn't something that'd be used as an example of Good Writing. Regardless of the fact that this article should have been updated a while ago, this shouldn't be a featured article.
