Talk:Paragaloomba: Difference between revisions
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) m (→Split Super Mario World and Mario Clash enemies into separate articles: This would be problematic, but worth pointing out..) |
(→Comments: stupid Nintendo and its stupid names) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Ideally, the resulting article should be "Para-Goomba (''Mario Clash'')" since that's the only known official English name, but if Winged Galoomba and Para-Galoomba are considered acceptable (I think based on [[Talk:Paragoomba#Split Para-Galoomba from Paragoomba|this proposal]]), then perhaps it can be "Para-Galoomba (''Mario Clash'')". [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:45, 8 January 2015 (EST) | Ideally, the resulting article should be "Para-Goomba (''Mario Clash'')" since that's the only known official English name, but if Winged Galoomba and Para-Galoomba are considered acceptable (I think based on [[Talk:Paragoomba#Split Para-Galoomba from Paragoomba|this proposal]]), then perhaps it can be "Para-Galoomba (''Mario Clash'')". [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 12:45, 8 January 2015 (EST) | ||
:If it weren't for the name stuff, I'd say just split it since it's clearly a different thing (I was already thinking of splitting it myself). Anyway, tbh, I kinda feel like the conjectural names would be better off not being used at all for ''any'' of these pages since it just adds another layer of confusion, and it's actually against policy: while "Winged Galoomba" and "Para-Galoomba" are extrapolated from plain "Galoomba", they're still conjectural, and shouldn't overrule the actual names. So then the pages would be "Winged Goomba (''Super Mario World'')", "Para-Goomba (''Super Mario World'')" and "Para-Goomba (''Mario Clash'')". After all, if we're using logic rather than canon for the names, the ''Mario Clash'' one would be something along the lines of "Sharp Winged Goomba" (like how a [[Spiky Parabuzzy]] is a [[Parabuzzy]] with a spike, but taking the Japanese name into account), and that's getting ''very'' conjectural and harder to defend beyond "but it makes sense". - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 13:10, 8 January 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 14:10, January 8, 2015
Split Super Mario World and Mario Clash enemies into separate articles
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Friday, July 5, 2024, 06:30 GMT
As if the Galoomba confusion wasn't enough, the "Winged Galoombas" in Mario Clash are not only referred to as "Para-Goombas" in the manual, but are given another name in the Japanese version, "Sharp Winged Galoomba". Since the growth of spikes on their head would also be an indication that they're really another sub-species of Galoomba, that should be reflected with a split. On the other hand, if they're instead deemed one and the same, then naming policy dictates both articles would be called "Para-Goomba" (since manuals trump most other potential sources).
Proposer: LinkTheLefty (talk)
Deadline: January 22, 2015, 23:59 GMT.
Support
- LinkTheLefty (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose
Comments
Ideally, the resulting article should be "Para-Goomba (Mario Clash)" since that's the only known official English name, but if Winged Galoomba and Para-Galoomba are considered acceptable (I think based on this proposal), then perhaps it can be "Para-Galoomba (Mario Clash)". LinkTheLefty (talk) 12:45, 8 January 2015 (EST)
- If it weren't for the name stuff, I'd say just split it since it's clearly a different thing (I was already thinking of splitting it myself). Anyway, tbh, I kinda feel like the conjectural names would be better off not being used at all for any of these pages since it just adds another layer of confusion, and it's actually against policy: while "Winged Galoomba" and "Para-Galoomba" are extrapolated from plain "Galoomba", they're still conjectural, and shouldn't overrule the actual names. So then the pages would be "Winged Goomba (Super Mario World)", "Para-Goomba (Super Mario World)" and "Para-Goomba (Mario Clash)". After all, if we're using logic rather than canon for the names, the Mario Clash one would be something along the lines of "Sharp Winged Goomba" (like how a Spiky Parabuzzy is a Parabuzzy with a spike, but taking the Japanese name into account), and that's getting very conjectural and harder to defend beyond "but it makes sense". - Walkazo 13:10, 8 January 2015 (EST)
