MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wii U: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tails Nick (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|ToadAwesome12}} | #{{User|ToadAwesome12}} | ||
#{{User|Tails Nick}} | #{{User|Tails Nick}} | ||
#{{User|SuperMarioBros}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
The wii u has just been released' so don't say not much info' ok?! {{User:Joseph/sig}} | The wii u has just been released' so don't say not much info' ok?! {{User:Joseph/sig}} | ||
:Except that's not true by any stretch of the imagination. The Wii U was released '''two years''' ago. Even if it was only recently released, that wouldn't justify a lack of information. Bottom line: If a page has insufficient coverage on the topic, as demonstrated by several one liners in the article, it shouldn't be featured.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 15:07, 12 August 2014 (EDT) | :Except that's not true by any stretch of the imagination. The Wii U was released '''two years''' ago. Even if it was only recently released, that wouldn't justify a lack of information. Bottom line: If a page has insufficient coverage on the topic, as demonstrated by several one liners in the article, it shouldn't be featured.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 15:07, 12 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
It has been out for 2 years already, and there are ton of games. {{User|SuperMarioBros}} | |||
Revision as of 16:04, September 5, 2014
Wii U
Support
- Joseph (talk) it has information about almost anything' and it shows all the controllers' software' and nice pictures. I might add other consoles if this gets featured.
- ToadAwesome12 (talk)
- Tails Nick (talk)
- SuperMarioBros (talk)
Oppose
- Ninelevendo (talk) Most of the games, accessories and whatnot haven't even been released yet, so we have little info here about it. There are heaps of one liners and it needs expansion. It also isn't formatted correctly.
- Vommack (talk) Per Ninelevendo and my comment below.
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per all, also this has a rewrite template.
- Peteyking64 (talk) I don't understand how this is a great article. There are many stuff missing.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
Any reason for {{rewrite}} in the software section? 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 22:53, 10 August 2014 (EDT)
It's nice anyway. Joseph (talk) (contribs) 
- But there has to be a reason or else people are going to use that as their reason to oppose. I'm not, since I'm very curious why the thing is there in the first place.
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 23:00, 10 August 2014 (EDT)
- Too be honest, articles like this should be featured after they have all software, hardware and games released for it. I mean, the GameCube Controller thing isn't the best, and I actually think that the games section isn't great either. I'm much more likely to oppose, but I'll think. -
00:57, 11 August 2014 (EDT)
- Too be honest, articles like this should be featured after they have all software, hardware and games released for it. I mean, the GameCube Controller thing isn't the best, and I actually think that the games section isn't great either. I'm much more likely to oppose, but I'll think. -
The wii u has just been released' so don't say not much info' ok?! Joseph (talk) (contribs)
- Except that's not true by any stretch of the imagination. The Wii U was released two years ago. Even if it was only recently released, that wouldn't justify a lack of information. Bottom line: If a page has insufficient coverage on the topic, as demonstrated by several one liners in the article, it shouldn't be featured.--Vommack (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2014 (EDT)
It has been out for 2 years already, and there are ton of games. SuperMarioBros (talk)
