MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Toad Town: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Ninelevendo (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== {{UNFANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth supp...") |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} Yet another Unfeature nomination, I know, but this article is just horrible. I'm sorry to say, but it's full of one liners, useless section and badly organised sections. The Paper Mario section and Mario & Luigi sections look OK, but the rest is pretty bad. There's a section about a mention of the town that is good, yet it somehow is able to triple the amount of writing in three games that it makes an actual appearance in. Anything after the History section is just a bunch of lists. The trivia could also be inc. and some of it isn't even needed. There are much better Unfeatured articles than this. | #{{User|Ninelevendo}} Yet another Unfeature nomination, I know, but this article is just horrible. I'm sorry to say, but it's full of one liners, useless section and badly organised sections. The Paper Mario section and Mario & Luigi sections look OK, but the rest is pretty bad. There's a section about a mention of the town that is good, yet it somehow is able to triple the amount of writing in three games that it makes an actual appearance in. Anything after the History section is just a bunch of lists. The trivia could also be inc. and some of it isn't even needed. There are much better Unfeatured articles than this. | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} Per Ninelevendo. This article is simply awful. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:38, August 20, 2014
Toad Town
Remove Featured Article Status
- Ninelevendo (talk) Yet another Unfeature nomination, I know, but this article is just horrible. I'm sorry to say, but it's full of one liners, useless section and badly organised sections. The Paper Mario section and Mario & Luigi sections look OK, but the rest is pretty bad. There's a section about a mention of the town that is good, yet it somehow is able to triple the amount of writing in three games that it makes an actual appearance in. Anything after the History section is just a bunch of lists. The trivia could also be inc. and some of it isn't even needed. There are much better Unfeatured articles than this.
- Vommack (talk) Per Ninelevendo. This article is simply awful.
