MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Yoshi's New Island

Yoshi's New Island

Support

1. Joseph (talk) It should be a featured article because it has nice writing and it has good information for the game.

Oppose

1. Mario (talk) It's an article with a scant screenshots and information (except for the transformation and reception section). As of its being nominated, it's barely anything more than a huge list. This article will need a major overhaul before we should even consider it to be featured.
2. Vommack (talk) It's little more than a few lists squashed together.
3. Baby Luigi (talk) Even if this article is featured as a featured list it STILL wouldn't meet featured list requirements. Per all.
4. Ninelevendo (talk) Bunch of lists squashed into each other with empty sections. Per all.
5. ToadAwesome12 (talk) This article is SO PACKED WITH FLOWERY WRITING. Per all.

Comments

Oh come on first you think an article is too short' and now it's too long. I don't understand you! Joseph (talk) (contribs)

And I don't understand you, because he never said it was too long.--Vommack (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2014 (EDT)

Who's "you"? Joseph, not Vommack. ToadAwesome12 11:44, 31 July 2014 (EDT)

I'm pretty sure Joseph is referring to me, since after my vote, the only major edit was Joseph's comment. Anyway _{I'm female}, I never said it was too long. I did, however, say that the article is low quality and just pretty bad. Just compare it to other featured game-related articles including Super Mario Bros. 2, Mario vs. Donkey Kong, Wario Land II, New Super Mario Bros.. Even Yoshi's Island DS, one of the worse featured articles, has more information, details, and it meets the bare requirements. Even Super Mario 3D World and Super Mario Bros., which aren't featured at this writing, is in much better shape than this. Length is not an issue, and even then, most of these articles are longer than this one. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 19:01, 31 July 2014 (EDT)