Talk:Master (title): Difference between revisions
m (→Support) |
|||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
#{{User|Vommack}} Pointless page, just remove the links and the orphan problem is solved. | #{{User|Vommack}} Pointless page, just remove the links and the orphan problem is solved. | ||
#{{User|Ghost Jam}} Per all. I'd suggest making sure that all information here is present in the host articles they were culled from, then expanding the disambiguation page to reflect the change. | #{{User|Ghost Jam}} Per all. I'd suggest making sure that all information here is present in the host articles they were culled from, then expanding the disambiguation page to reflect the change. | ||
#{{User|Tsunami}} Well, I was about to say no, because there are some informations here, but an article for this is really pointless. We can delete it but the infos should go to the intrested articles (King K. Rool and others). | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== |
Revision as of 02:14, July 25, 2014
Ooh ooh! Can you make another paragraph describing Krusha's rise to power at the bottom of the article? -- Son of Suns
I'll try, as I mentioned, I only have vague remembrance, but I think it has something to do with Krusha becoming super intelligent; I'll do some research. -- Sir Grodus
Cool. Thanks for your help! -- Son of Suns
Thanks, thats about all I could find. Too bad they took almost all the episodes off YouTube. -- Sir Grodus
May I ask where the term "Master" in this context originated? It certainly wasn't in any Donkey Kong game I've played. -- CM August
DKC3, it has KAOS called "Master" several times, as well as in the manual for it. Now that I think about, it just seems to be a term of respect, like "Lord Bowser", with no other significance or meaning. -- Sir Grodus 18:47, 16 November 2007 (EST)
Perhaps we could note in the article that the title is conjectural, and cite the source of the name.--CM August 19:32, 16 November 2007 (EST)
Royal Title
Is Master a royal title or is it just King K. Rool who is royalty or all the former masters Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
{{delete}}
This article is useless. I don't wanna set up a talk page proposal this time. There's no need to go through two weeks to see this page nuked. I'm going to remove all the links to this page. All I'm hoping is if people agree with my actions. 3...2...1... delete. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:56, 11 June 2014 (EDT)
- I'm uncomfortable with deleting an article based on "I don't like it". Removing deletion tag, get a TPP going. -- Chris 14:57, 18 June 2014 (EDT)
Delete "Master"
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, November 24, 2024, 22:26 GMT
I've wanted this article to be deleted (reasons now clarified below), but since it has garnered no attention, I guess I have just have to set up a 2-week long talk page proposal. Oh boy, here it goes.
- The writing is pretty bad, with even some speculation about it. By itself, it's not a great reason, but it's not a good sign when the bulk of the article is composed of this trite "it's unknown if" phrase.
- The other Master articles have much more use than this.
- This article is just overall pointless. Princess, Doctor, King(disambig), all these don't have standalone articles and for a good reason. They're pointless.
- See Super Star (Mario Party winner's title) and "Super star" terminology from SuperStar saga. I can't find the particular revision of these articles for context, unfortunately.
Proposer: It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk)
Deadline: August 7, 2014 23:59 GMT
Support
- Mario (talk) It's a pointless title that serves no purpose other than doing a negligible job at preventing orphan pages, I guess.
- Baby Luigi (talk) This article lacks masterful writing and masterful reasons to stay here. Delete it. Per Mario.
- Vommack (talk) Pointless page, just remove the links and the orphan problem is solved.
- Ghost Jam (talk) Per all. I'd suggest making sure that all information here is present in the host articles they were culled from, then expanding the disambiguation page to reflect the change.
- Tsunami (talk) Well, I was about to say no, because there are some informations here, but an article for this is really pointless. We can delete it but the infos should go to the intrested articles (King K. Rool and others).