MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Baby Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Yoshi876 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Baby Donkey Kong to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Baby Donkey Kong: Nomination failed) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=16:47, 18 February 2014 (EST) | |nominated=16:47, 18 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=21:47, 20 March 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
[[Category:FA failure archives]] | |||
Revision as of 02:49, April 20, 2014
Baby Donkey Kong
Support
Pinkie Pie (talk)Since the admin has removed the 9000 bytes rule, we should renominate this article.- RodKimble (talk)
Oppose
- Mario (talk) This article is... bare. Also, the reasons for featuring this article doesn't logically connect. Articles like this should be renominated because the rule has been removed? How many times do we have to say this? The 9,000 bytes rule is simply a guideline. Unlike Macho Grubba, this article is, again, bare. Also, without considerable padding, the opening "paragraph" is way too short to look nice on the main page.
- Ashley and Red (talk)Per Mario.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per Mario, it should also be pointed out that this article has unfeatured before the byte size limit came in.
- Epic Rosalina (talk) This article doesn't seem appropriate for being featured, plus the nominator has been blocked, so this and the Gus nomination should fail.
- Fandro (talk) Per Mario, Per Epic Rosalina.
- Shy Guy Per Mario, Per All.
