MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Toad: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) m (→Oppose) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't see any problems with this article, it looks very long, it has no red links or improvment templates. I never saw this featured. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I don't see any problems with this article, it looks very long, it has no red links or improvment templates. I never saw this featured. | ||
#{{User|PiranhaPlantLover17}} I think that this article should be nominated because Toad deserves some spotlight. A lot of people always go for the more familiar faces like Mario or Luigi, but rarely anyone veers towards Toad. I love Toad and I think he's pretty awesome. Cute and awesome. And there is so much good information to learn about him. I nominate Toad's article to be recognized as a featured article! Go Toad! | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:31, March 20, 2014
Toad
Support
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) I don't see any problems with this article, it looks very long, it has no red links or improvment templates. I never saw this featured.
- PiranhaPlantLover17 (talk) I think that this article should be nominated because Toad deserves some spotlight. A lot of people always go for the more familiar faces like Mario or Luigi, but rarely anyone veers towards Toad. I love Toad and I think he's pretty awesome. Cute and awesome. And there is so much good information to learn about him. I nominate Toad's article to be recognized as a featured article! Go Toad!
Oppose
- Time Turner (talk) This article is so packed full of flowery writing that we could write a book using it. Also, perhaps it's because I'm on mobile, but this article looks ridiculously padded. Like someone tried to make it bigger for the sole purpose of making it bigger. I don't know if there's any missing information, or if there are things that should be covered, but these two problems alone cannot be allowed for a featured article. One more thing: "I never saw this featured" is the absolute worst reason to feature something, and should not be used as a valid reason in any circumstance.
