Talk:Super Mario 64 DS: Difference between revisions
Mariofan132 (talk | contribs) m (→Remake) |
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{{User:Mariofan132/sig}} | {{User:Mariofan132/sig}} | ||
:Using the same title and the same base environs. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | |||
Revision as of 13:51, May 12, 2007
Shouldn't we merge this article with Super Mario 64? It's simply a remake w/ some newly created challenges, more characters and a slightly different storyline. The powers and levels are still the same, with improved graphics. Wayoshi 20:57, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
- I'm not sure. There are enough chages to Super Mario 64 DS its own article. More playable characters, more levels, more stars, different power-ups, including the Power Flower. It's much more than a simple remake. However, the two pages should be linked together. --Son of Suns 02:03, 5 July 2006 (EDT)
Canon?
Is this really a canon game, or a Spinoff? I mean even Bowser's not stupid enough to try the same thing two times! (oh wait, he did in NSMB, sorry)
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maxlover2 (talk).
Also, the Japaense Super Mario Bros. 2 (Lost Levels for us) was nearly identical to his plan in the first. So yes, it's feasible that he'd repeat his original plan. ChrisAlassal 03:02, 4 March 2007 (EST)
Man, Bowser needs better ideas. I mean, if it failed once, it will again. 
Remake
This isn't a remake. It has new characters, new levels, and a slightly different plot. True, Super Mario Advance 3 had extra levels, but remakes don't include new plots. That isn't saying since Super Mario Advance 3 has extra levels, it should be two different games. It's saying that there are too many differences between 64 and 64 DS.
- They are two different games, but SM64 DS is still a remake of SM64. -- Son of Suns
But how?
- Using the same title and the same base environs. -- Son of Suns
