MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Shadow Queen: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Oppose) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Epic Rosalina}} The intro section is short, I'll try expanding it after I do some research since I don't have PMTTYD. | #{{User|Epic Rosalina}} The intro section is short, I'll try expanding it after I do some research since I don't have PMTTYD. | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} Similarly to [[Baby Donkey Kong]], the whole article feels... bare. Also, the History section often puts away focus from the Shadow Queen to give exposition or details, which shouldn't be the case since this is an article about the Shadow Queen. The first part of the Personality section also gets a bit too flowery ("ruthless and humorless"?), and this kind of writing pops up a bit too much throughout the article for me to be comfortable with calling this an FA, even regardless of its bareness. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 15:41, February 21, 2014
Shadow Queen
Support
- Ashley and Red (talk)I worked hard on it, also the article looks good. There aren't any major grammar issues
Oppose
- Epic Rosalina (talk) The intro section is short, I'll try expanding it after I do some research since I don't have PMTTYD.
- Time Turner (talk) Similarly to Baby Donkey Kong, the whole article feels... bare. Also, the History section often puts away focus from the Shadow Queen to give exposition or details, which shouldn't be the case since this is an article about the Shadow Queen. The first part of the Personality section also gets a bit too flowery ("ruthless and humorless"?), and this kind of writing pops up a bit too much throughout the article for me to be comfortable with calling this an FA, even regardless of its bareness.
