MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Banned user votes go, as do votes that are simply perring it. I am opposing however) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I fixed it, but could someone try removing several instances where "after that" is used? {{User|Demonic KB}} | I fixed it, but could someone try removing several instances where "after that" is used? {{User|Demonic KB}} | ||
::You can use this expression when saying things that hapened ''after''the last one. Ah and my support slashed {{User|Ashley and Red}} | ::You can use this expression when saying things that hapened ''after''the last one. Ah and my support slashed {{User|Ashley and Red}} | ||
Well, the history section seems a bit... ahem... ''beefy''. You know, that 17 paragraph essay on Baby Luigi's ''Partners in Time'' article? Does this fall under the same category? {{User|Mario}} | |||
Revision as of 13:49, February 19, 2014
Rawk Hawk
Remove Featured Article Status
#Ashley and Red (talk)The article looks good, but there is a rule that says that articles must be in present tense, this one is in past.
Keep Featured Article Status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
If you do that I will remove my supportAshley and Red (talk)
I fixed it, but could someone try removing several instances where "after that" is used? Demonic KB (talk)
- You can use this expression when saying things that hapened afterthe last one. Ah and my support slashed Ashley and Red (talk)
Well, the history section seems a bit... ahem... beefy. You know, that 17 paragraph essay on Baby Luigi's Partners in Time article? Does this fall under the same category? Mario (talk)
