Talk:Axem Rangers: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Response.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. [[User:Great Gonzo|Great Gonzo]] | :::Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. [[User:Great Gonzo|Great Gonzo]] | ||
::::Question is, will you bother to exercise that potential? On top of that, focus on forming some criteria for inclusion. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | |||
Guide content is fine as long as it is official. Those articles have potential. And Wayoshi does not speak for the entire wiki - he is one member of a greater community. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | Guide content is fine as long as it is official. Those articles have potential. And Wayoshi does not speak for the entire wiki - he is one member of a greater community. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||
:Why is it fine? This isn't a guide. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:20, May 7, 2007
Each Axem Ranger, as an individual character, deserves an article. They do act independently - each has their own stats and attacks. The articles will not be merged, and it's not a big deal that they are seperate but shorter. -- Son of Suns
- I agreee they should be kept seperate. Great Gonzo
- You know what's funny? It actually IS a big deal that they are short and will never be more than a stub. If you can't make the articles larger without adding guide content, then how are you going to validate them having an article? On top of that, I did indeed consult with Wayoshi, who appears to be of importance in the community of the Super Mario Wiki. - A Link to the Past 14:17, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. Great Gonzo
- Question is, will you bother to exercise that potential? On top of that, focus on forming some criteria for inclusion. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
- Yes but so is Son of Suns and I, and we both appear to oppose this merge, there is potential here. Great Gonzo
Guide content is fine as long as it is official. Those articles have potential. And Wayoshi does not speak for the entire wiki - he is one member of a greater community. -- Son of Suns
- Why is it fine? This isn't a guide. - A Link to the Past 14:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
