Talk:Lightning: Difference between revisions
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) m (HK-47) |
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::No, I understood the title. I just didn't know if you saw the last, final edit I made. I wanted to know your final approval. :) --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 16:35, 14 June 2006 (EDT) | :::No, I understood the title. I just didn't know if you saw the last, final edit I made. I wanted to know your final approval. :) --[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 16:35, 14 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
::::I think its great. But you need not my aproval(sp). You're the sysop. Not me. You have more experience. I think its great. But its still your call in the long run.[[User:HK-47|HK-47]] 16:41, 14 June 2006 (EDT) | ::::I think its great. But you need not my aproval(sp). You're the sysop. Not me. You have more experience. I think its great. But its still your call in the long run.[[User:HK-47|HK-47]] 16:41, 14 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
:::::While I am a sysop, I am here simply to facilitate other users. I want others to make the calls, not me.--[[User:Son of Suns| | :::::While I am a sysop, I am here simply to facilitate other users. I want others to make the calls, not me.--[[User:Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] 16:44, 14 June 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 15:44, June 14, 2006
Thunder Rage Disscusion
Should we make this a sub-section of thunderbolt? You know, merge it or something? HK-47 15:48, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
I don't think so. They are two completely items from two different genres of video games. --Son of Suns 15:50, 14 June 2006 (EDT) Ok, they just seemed similar. Wait! Isnt there a thunderbolt in Paper Mario!? That would make them even more similar! HK-47 15:52, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
Actually. Yes there is a Thunder Bolt item. So...it's your call. There is also a Thunderbolt page for the item in the Mario Kart series. --Son of Suns 15:58, 14 June 2006 (EDT) I.... (ponders ramifacations of each option).....(ponders how to spell ramifacations correctly)... I think we should merge all three. I, however, am not confident enough to do this myself. Nor have I yet assertained(sp?) the knowledge required to complete this task. HK-47 16:03, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
I think it more easily acssessable(sp) here. HK-47 16:16, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
Just wanted to move it here. Is that okay? HK-47 16:15, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
Smooth Move
Alright dude! HK-47 16:13, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- Ummmm....is this better? --Son of Suns 16:25, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- Yes it is. Did the title "smooth move" throw you off. It meant that the merge went well. Thanks! HK-47 16:31, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- No, I understood the title. I just didn't know if you saw the last, final edit I made. I wanted to know your final approval. :) --Son of Suns 16:35, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- I think its great. But you need not my aproval(sp). You're the sysop. Not me. You have more experience. I think its great. But its still your call in the long run.HK-47 16:41, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- While I am a sysop, I am here simply to facilitate other users. I want others to make the calls, not me.--Son of Suns 16:44, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- I think its great. But you need not my aproval(sp). You're the sysop. Not me. You have more experience. I think its great. But its still your call in the long run.HK-47 16:41, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- No, I understood the title. I just didn't know if you saw the last, final edit I made. I wanted to know your final approval. :) --Son of Suns 16:35, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
- Yes it is. Did the title "smooth move" throw you off. It meant that the merge went well. Thanks! HK-47 16:31, 14 June 2006 (EDT)