MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Neo Bowser City: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} I disagree with the trivia, I think it's far too long, and the starting section isn't long enough. | #{{User|Yoshi876}} I disagree with the trivia, I think it's far too long, and the starting section isn't long enough. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The beginning section is long enough and the trivia is gone, but nothing can be done to increase the length of this incredibly short article without padding, and it doesn't qualify according to the proposal I referred in the comments section. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The beginning section is long enough and the trivia is gone, but nothing can be done to increase the length of this incredibly short article without padding, and it doesn't qualify according to the proposal I referred in the comments section. | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} As much as I would like to see this article featured, I feel that the now incorporated trivia makes the starting paragraph seem a bit messy and rather unorganized. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
Revision as of 14:25, July 31, 2013
Neo Bowser City
Support
- Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk) The page is well written, no typos, is long enough, and has enough pictures. There are no tags, it's detailed, and the trivia section is good size.
- Mario7 (talk)
Oppose
- Yoshi876 (talk) I disagree with the trivia, I think it's far too long, and the starting section isn't long enough.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) The beginning section is long enough and the trivia is gone, but nothing can be done to increase the length of this incredibly short article without padding, and it doesn't qualify according to the proposal I referred in the comments section.
- Tails777 (talk) As much as I would like to see this article featured, I feel that the now incorporated trivia makes the starting paragraph seem a bit messy and rather unorganized.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
@Mario7: you only have to put your username. Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
@Yoshi876: I did some work on it. Is that good? Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
- IMO the Trivia is still too long, and the starting section is still to short. Yoshi876 (talk)
- How can I fix it? Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
- Remove trivia and incorporate it into the main article and starting section. Yoshi876 (talk)
- Three trivia pieces: half of what it was. Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
- Remove trivia and incorporate it into the main article and starting section. Yoshi876 (talk)
- How can I fix it? Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
Thanks Mario7. I forgot I could do that Gonzales Kart Inc. (talk)
- Isn't the article a bit on the short side? I know there was a proposal about shortening the length of articles, but since its provisions are so vague, I don't know if this even qualifies. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- As the proposer of that proposal I don't think so, I know I thought Grouchy Possessor was long enough in that proposal, but I think that is too short now, same with this considering, at least for me, it takes 2 presses of PgDn to reach the bottom. Yoshi876 (talk)
