Template talk:Game-screenshot: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


:We already have one: [[Template:Tv-screenshot]]. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
:We already have one: [[Template:Tv-screenshot]]. -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
==copyright to publisher==
I believe the part where it says
:''the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game''
should be changed into
:''the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that '''published''' the game''
since, well, in most cases only the publisher holds the copyrights for a game (for istance copyrights for all Mario and related series games are held by Nintendo, not by Rare, Square Enix, Bandai Namco, etc.)--[[User:Kombatgod|Kombatgod]] ([[User talk:Kombatgod|talk]]) 06:38, 22 April 2013 (EDT)
: I believe that in most cases, developers may still have right to the engine, assets w/e of a game even if they don't own the franchise, but you're right. Thanks for pointing this out. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 07:24, 22 April 2013 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 06:25, April 22, 2013

Should we make a seperate template for Mario tv shows? --Clay Mario (talk)

We already have one: Template:Tv-screenshot. -- Son of Suns (talk)

copyright to publisher[edit]

I believe the part where it says

the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game

should be changed into

the copyright for it is most likely held by the company that published the game

since, well, in most cases only the publisher holds the copyrights for a game (for istance copyrights for all Mario and related series games are held by Nintendo, not by Rare, Square Enix, Bandai Namco, etc.)--Kombatgod (talk) 06:38, 22 April 2013 (EDT)

I believe that in most cases, developers may still have right to the engine, assets w/e of a game even if they don't own the franchise, but you're right. Thanks for pointing this out. --Glowsquid (talk) 07:24, 22 April 2013 (EDT)