MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Removal of Support/Oppose Votes: Sorry, forgot username) |
Mario4Ever (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} Articles are not featured because of their subject's popularity. They are featured because they are supposed to represent the best that the wiki has to offer. Personal bias has no place here. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} Articles are not featured because of their subject's popularity. They are featured because they are supposed to represent the best that the wiki has to offer. Personal bias has no place here. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all, this is the second fan vote we've had to remove -_- | #{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all, this is the second fan vote we've had to remove -_- | ||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per all. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 13:23, March 23, 2013
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
Remove Featured Article Status
- Yoshi876 (talk) Well, the Trivia section is too long and many sections of the article don't follow the Empty Sections Policy.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Those two problems above are easily fixed, but my main complaint about this article is that it does not cover all information available. This article (and the other two Mario & Luigi featured articles) has failed to cover badges, clothes, and key items. Without this vital information, this article is not complete. This is why I tagged a rewrite-expand template in the Items section.
- Glowsquid (talk) the plot "summary" is awful in every way imaginable and some that have yet to be invented.
- MeritC (talk) Yep, too many tags attached to it showing that the article has some series problems. And if I'm not mistaken, is the whole article in need of a REWRITE!!! overall?
- King Pikante (talk) I have no idea why this article is featured. It needs a rewrite template, not a featured article status. It just needs an overall rewrite.
Keep Featured Article Status
- Tanookitoad (talk) This is the best game in the Mario & Luigi Series! Why remove it?!
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Tanookitoad
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time is a great game, but we're unfeaturing it because the article needs work. Let's put it into perspective: would you want this article featured in the front page if there are only four sentences for this entire article? Probably not. So, we're unfeaturing this for its content, not because the game is good.
- GreenDisaster (talk) Articles are not featured because of their subject's popularity. They are featured because they are supposed to represent the best that the wiki has to offer. Personal bias has no place here.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per all, this is the second fan vote we've had to remove -_-
- Mario4Ever (talk) Per all.
Comments
LeftyGreenMario is female. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- So sorry, I apologize :( Yoshi876 (talk)
- Don't worry. I'm totally OK with that. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I just want to let you know, I think Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story's article has similar problems, but I don't want to go over this (pretty unnecessary) FA nomination number. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
