MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart (series): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (the five headline means those who reply back your comment) |
m (Currently has an oppose vote; but I think it's going to get back to "qualify for unfeatured" status after a certain amount of time.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{UNFANOMSTAT | {{UNFANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=20:20, March 15, 2013 | |nominated=20:20, March 15, 2013 | ||
|passed= | |passed= | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 19:29, March 18, 2013
Mario Kart (series)
Remove Featured Article Status
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I have some issues with this article. The first thing I did was tagging an image needed template in the item section, because the section is seriously devoid of images. Another issue I have is the organization of the article. The game section, and maybe some other sections (e.g. technique, game modes) needs to be put into neat tables, much as the Yoshi (series) article. And last, this article is missing information on the Arcade GP games. Until this article gets some overhaul on its appearance, it shouldn't be featured like this.
- King Pikante (talk) The organization of the article is not very good and the item section lacks pictures.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all. The item section desperately needs a table.
- GreenDisaster (talk) Everything that I want to say has already been said. Per all.
- MeritC (talk) Per all; I call foul on this as well. This article is not presentable enough considering there are no additional images place here to help describe the content better. And agreed with LeftyGreenMario, that image tag WAS needed in this case.
Keep Featured Article Status
- Wintermelon43 (talk) There are images in the item's page.i say keep article status
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Wintermelon43 (talk)
- Tucayo (talk) - That's not the only problem with the page. And most articles have images, your point is invalid.
- GreenDisaster (talk) That's not the only problem with the article.
