MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} This article has the same problems as its prequel, ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]''. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved ''rewrite-expand'' template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} This article has the same problems as its prequel, ''[[Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time]]''. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved ''rewrite-expand'' template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article. | ||
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GD. | #{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GD. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per all. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Revision as of 12:29, March 18, 2013
Mario & Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story
Remove Featured Article Status
- GreenDisaster (talk) This article has the same problems as its prequel, Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time. The story section is padded beyond belief with fanciful sentences, unnecessary details, and is generally horrible grammar-wise, the trivia section is clogged, it doesn't follow the empty section policy, it has a well-deserved rewrite-expand template for its item section (added before this nomination and not by me), since it only covers consumable items... I think I've gone over everything that's problematic with this article.
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GD.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per all.
